2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10021-018-0264-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bird Diversity in Urban Ecosystems: The Role of the Biome and Land Use Along Urbanization Gradients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

8
42
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
8
42
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Urbanization could exert large influences on breeding bird populations through the destroy of nest sites and the eliminating of food resources (Han et al, 2019; Hensley et al, 2019). Additional gradient studies have revealed that along an urbanization gradient, avian species richness peaks in moderately urbanized areas (Blair, 1999; Jokimaki & Suhonen, 1993; Pal et al, 2019; Verma & Das Murmu, 2015), which is the intermediate disturbance hypothesis (Connell, 1978), while a recent study suggested that it depends on the end of the gradient and biome (Filloy, Andres Zurita & Isabel Bellocq, 2019). Studies focusing on the avian-environment relationship have generally shown that in comparison to regional factors, local habitat configuration has a greater effect on this relationship (Evans, Newson & Gaston, 2009), especially for species with limited dispersion capacity (Graham & Blake, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Urbanization could exert large influences on breeding bird populations through the destroy of nest sites and the eliminating of food resources (Han et al, 2019; Hensley et al, 2019). Additional gradient studies have revealed that along an urbanization gradient, avian species richness peaks in moderately urbanized areas (Blair, 1999; Jokimaki & Suhonen, 1993; Pal et al, 2019; Verma & Das Murmu, 2015), which is the intermediate disturbance hypothesis (Connell, 1978), while a recent study suggested that it depends on the end of the gradient and biome (Filloy, Andres Zurita & Isabel Bellocq, 2019). Studies focusing on the avian-environment relationship have generally shown that in comparison to regional factors, local habitat configuration has a greater effect on this relationship (Evans, Newson & Gaston, 2009), especially for species with limited dispersion capacity (Graham & Blake, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although several studies have shown the importance of primary productivity (Haedo et al 2017, Leveau et al 2018, Filloy et al 2018) and habitat diversity (Leveau 2013b) determining the spatial variation of species richness in urban areas, this is the first case study where both variables are considered in the context of species-energy relationships.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim of this study is to evaluate which mechanism is more likely explaining the bird species richness variation along three urban-rural gradients of the Pampean region, Argentina. Although several studies have proposed theoretical models of bird richness response to urbanization (Lepczyk et al 2008, Filloy et al 2018), species-energy relationships have been scarcely studied and, to my knowledge, several hypotheses have never been explored simultaneously in urban environments yet. Unlike natural systems, in which primary productivity and habitat diversity are usually correlated (Hurlbert 2004), urban-rural gradients in central Argentina allows to separate the effects of these variables because agricultural areas can have a high primary productivity but a low habitat heterogeneity due to crops dominance (Leveau 2013a, Leveau et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, from an ecological perspective, the extirpation of species as a result of human disturbances can be considered a novel ecological filter 18,19 ; in addition, human disturbance can influence the condition of existing ecological filters (such as resources availability). Previous studies have shown that the response of populations and communities to human disturbance partially depends on the similarity between the native and the disturbed habitat 20,21 . Land uses maintaining key components from the native habitat, such as specific resources or abiotic conditions, usually preserve the conditions of ecological filters and the diversity of species, whereas land uses that strongly change the filter conditions are used mainly by extra-regional or invasive species with different ecological requirements 20,[22][23][24] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have shown that the response of populations and communities to human disturbance partially depends on the similarity between the native and the disturbed habitat 20,21 . Land uses maintaining key components from the native habitat, such as specific resources or abiotic conditions, usually preserve the conditions of ecological filters and the diversity of species, whereas land uses that strongly change the filter conditions are used mainly by extra-regional or invasive species with different ecological requirements 20,[22][23][24] . While different land uses within a region can be viewed as a gradient of suitability for native species 25 , the intensity of these changes can be strongly influenced by the regional context or biome as the species' range of tolerance to environmental conditions, which defines the ecological niche, at this scale depends on evolutionary processes 24 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%