1981
DOI: 10.2307/1367415
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bird Communities and Forest Structure in the Sierra Nevada of California

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
27
0
1

Year Published

1985
1985
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This index varies less with sample size than do the indices of Simpson (1949) or Hill (1973) (Beedy 1981).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This index varies less with sample size than do the indices of Simpson (1949) or Hill (1973) (Beedy 1981).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…As many studies have pointed out (e.g., Morrison and Meslow, 1983;Yui and Suzuki, 1987;Nakamura et al, 1992), our results have also suggested that a higher number of bird species should be maintained by retaining broad-leaved trees in coniferous plantations. Beedy (1981) showed that the structure of a forest canopy was a primary factor influencing the size and composition of bird communities during both the nesting and post-nesting period and that the open-canopy forests had more diverse bird communities than the closed-canopy forests probably because the open forests had more developed understories. In contrast, Yui (1976) demonstrated that bird communities were more diverse in closed-canopy forests than in opencanopy forests, but the importance of understories has also been emphasized by other studies (Beedy, 1981;Yui, 1983).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large number of studies has shown interactions between forest and bird community (MacArthur and MacArthur, 1961;Yui, 1976, 1977, Yui and Suzuki, 1987Beedy, 1981;Bell, 1984;Schwab and Sinclair, 1994). Recently, greater attention has been focused on the effect of planting after intense logging of natural forests on bird communities in various forest types and from various points of view (Smith, 1984(Smith, , 1985 or on other mammal species (Hayes et al, 1995).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inclusion of hyperparameters and quadratic terms in the model allowed the shapes of these associations (positive or negative slope vs. unimodal) to vary by species. We expected differences in elevation and canopy cover to reflect variation in habitat and to be associated with differences in bird species composition (Beedy 1981, Siegel and DeSante 2003, Furnas and Callas 2015. All (471) 40% (21) a Averaged for the 200 m buffer surrounding survey sites and random locations.…”
Section: Occupancy Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%