2021
DOI: 10.1070/sm9386
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Birational types of algebraic orbifolds

Abstract: We introduce a variant of the birational symbols group of Kontsevich, Pestun and the second author, and use this to define birational invariants of algebraic orbifolds.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is a stable G-birational invariant of X, as well as a stable birational invariant of the quotient stack [X/G], in the sense of [20,Sect. 4].…”
Section: Stable Birational Invariants Of G-actionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a stable G-birational invariant of X, as well as a stable birational invariant of the quotient stack [X/G], in the sense of [20,Sect. 4].…”
Section: Stable Birational Invariants Of G-actionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Burnside groups of stacks. In [17] we defined Burn n , the Burnside group of orbifolds, receiving birational equivalence classes of algebraic orbifolds; we write [X ] ∈ Burn n for the class of the quotient stack X := [X/G]. In [16,Section 7] we defined a homomorphism…”
Section: Properties Of Equivariant Burnside Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let G be a finite group, and k a field of characteristic zero containing all roots of unity of order dividing |G|. In this paper, we continue the study of the equivariant Burnside group Burn n (G), introduced in [16], building on [15], [14], [17], and [13]. This group receives G-equivariant birational equivalence classes [X ý G] of smooth projective varieties X with generically free G-action.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus the difference of these two classes lies in the kernel of the map K(Var dim Remark 2.3.4. A different manifestation of the isomorphism in Proposition 2.3.1 also appears in Proposition 2.2 of[KT21].…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%