2018
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1816724116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bipolar switching by HCN voltage sensor underlies hyperpolarization activation

Abstract: SignificanceHyperpolarization-activated, cyclic nucleotide-gated (HCN) channels show an inverted voltage response compared with virtually all other voltage-gated channels, opening on hyperpolarization rather than depolarization. Although the structure of the HCN1 channel was recently solved, the structural element(s) responsible for the inverted gating polarity of HCN is not known. Here, we use a hierarchical approach, by first characterizing the functional contribution of each structural element to channel ga… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
39
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(79 reference statements)
1
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, cutting the S4-S5 linker in non-domain-swapped channels, such as hyperpolarizationactivated HCN channels or depolarization-activated Kv10.1 (EAG) and Kv11.1 (hERG) channels 7,8 , does not prevent gating 16,17 , showing that non-domain-swapped channels do not require a covalent link between S4 and S5. Instead, non-covalent interactions between S4 and S5 have been suggested to be important for hyperpolarization activation of HCN channels 16,[18][19][20] . A recent study suggested that S4 inhibits the PD of HCN channels when S4 is up and that the downward S4 movement at hyperpolarized voltages relieves this inhibition 16 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, cutting the S4-S5 linker in non-domain-swapped channels, such as hyperpolarizationactivated HCN channels or depolarization-activated Kv10.1 (EAG) and Kv11.1 (hERG) channels 7,8 , does not prevent gating 16,17 , showing that non-domain-swapped channels do not require a covalent link between S4 and S5. Instead, non-covalent interactions between S4 and S5 have been suggested to be important for hyperpolarization activation of HCN channels 16,[18][19][20] . A recent study suggested that S4 inhibits the PD of HCN channels when S4 is up and that the downward S4 movement at hyperpolarized voltages relieves this inhibition 16 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent study suggested that S4 inhibits the PD of HCN channels when S4 is up and that the downward S4 movement at hyperpolarized voltages relieves this inhibition 16 . In another study, it was shown that a chimera with the VSD from a hyperpolarization-activated HCN channel and the PD from a depolarization-activated EAG channel could open both in response to depolarizations and hyperpolarizations 20 . The authors, therefore, suggested that S4 functions as a bipolar switch: S4 moves from a common resting position to an inward down position to open hyperpolarization-activated HCN channels, but S4 moves from the common resting position to an outward up position to open depolarization-activated EAG channels.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, it has been proposed that the voltage-dependent gating of HCN and related depolarization-activated KCNH channels is more conserved than previously thought (34). The VSD of HCN channels is capable of activating the channels with depolarization but this ability is masked by rapid inactivation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the S4-S5 linker is not required for the HCN channel opening with hyperpolarization as co-expression of the VSD and pore domain of spHCN (sea urchin HCN) channels as separate proteins generated hyperpolarization activated currents (33). It has been proposed that an extensive interface between the S4 and S5 in HCN channels is responsible for the apparent hyperpolarization-dependent activation in HCN channels (34). Consistent with this hypothesis, coexpression of the PD with the VSD lacking the Cterminal end of the S4 resulted in cNMP modulated but voltage-independent channels (33) and cross-linking the S4 and S5 could lock the channels in the "locked-open" or "locked-closed" states (35,36).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the rearrangement is similar to the S4 movement in VSD2 of the depolarization-activated two-pore channel 1 (TPC1) inferred from structures of mouse TPC1 (up state) and Ba 2+ -inhibited Arabidopsis TPC1 (down state) at 0 mV 26,27 (Supplementary Video 6), but is incompatible with other models proposing that the S4 helix is relatively immobile 28 . Moreover, considering the tight packing of S4 and S5 helices in HCN channels 11 , the downward and tilting movement of the S4 helix could bypass the short S4-S5 linker to influence S5 directly, thus allowing the channels to open 29,30 . Our study has revealed, for the first time, the detailed movement of the S4 helix of a VSD during hyperpolarization.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%