Bipolar multiplex families have an increased burden of common risk variants for psychiatric disorders

Abstract

Multiplex families with a high prevalence of a psychiatric disorder are often examined to identify rare genetic variants with large effect sizes. In the present study, we analysed whether the risk for bipolar disorder (BD) in BD multiplex families is influenced by common genetic variants. Furthermore, we investigated whether this risk is conferred mainly by BD-specific risk variants or by variants also associated with the susceptibility to schizophrenia or major depression. In total, 395 individuals from 33 Andalusian BD multiplex families as well as 438 subjects from an independent, sporadic BD case-control cohort were analysed. Polygenic risk scores (PRS) for BD, schizophrenia, and major depression were calculated and compared between the cohorts. Both the familial BD cases and unaffected family members had significantly higher PRS for all three psychiatric disorders than the independent controls, suggesting a high baseline risk for several psychiatric disorders in the families. Moreover, familial BD cases showed significantly higher BD PRS than unaffected family members and sporadic BD cases. A plausible hypothesis is that, in multiplex families with a general increase in risk for psychiatric disease, BD development is attributable to a high burden of common variants that confer a specific risk for BD. The present analyses, therefore, demonstrated that common genetic risk variants for psychiatric disorders are likely to contribute to the high incidence of affective psychiatric disorders in the multiplex families. The PRS explained only part of the observed phenotypic variance and rare variants might have also contributed to disease development.

Polygenic risk for major depression is associated with lifetime suicide attempt in US soldiers independent of personal and parental history of major depression

“…Importantly, we were able to show that MDD PRS added to the predictive utility of two readily obtainable self‐report parameters of SA risk, personal (lifetime) and family history of MDD. Whereas it might have been expected that there would be a higher MDD PRS in those with a positive family history of MDD (Andlauer et al, 2021), it is noteworthy that MDD PRS added to the explanatory power of that self‐report parameter alone. The same is true of personal history of MDD, on which MDD PRS is trained.…”

Genome-wide association study and polygenic risk score analysis for hearing measures in children

“…Most PRS studies report shared genetic risk for different outcomes, e.g. risk for one disorder tends to increase risk for other disorders (Andlauer et al, 2019) or poor cognitive performance (Gialluisi et al, 2019). Instead, we found that PRS for schizophrenia were associated with better hearing.…”

Treatment- and population-specific genetic risk factors for anti-drug antibodies against interferon-beta

“…PRS were calculated in R v3.33 using imput In each outer cross-validation instance, the cutoff producing the maximum sensitivity across three inner cross-validation folds was tested on the remaining fold. Nested cross-validation was repeated 100 times and the mean cutoff of the 100 repetitions was used as the final cutoff.ed genetic data, as described previously [44, 45]. For each PRS, the effect sizes of variants from the discovery-stage analyses (training data), below a selected discovery-stage p -value threshold, were multiplied by the imputed SNP dosage in the replication-stage test data and then summed to produce a single PRS per threshold.…”

“…PRS were calculated in R v3.33 using imput In each outer cross-validation instance, the cutoff producing the maximum sensitivity across three inner cross-validation folds was tested on the remaining fold. Nested cross-validation was repeated 100 times and the mean cutoff of the 100 repetitions was used as the final cutoff.ed genetic data, as described previously [44,45] For the prediction of the presence of nADA in the replication dataset, logistic regression of the eight PRS, the top single GWAS variant, and the top HLA allele from the discovery stage was conducted using the GWAS models. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was calculated using the R package pROC, its 95 % confidence interval (CI) with the function ci.auc (2000 stratified bootstrap replicates).…”