2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2008.06.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biphenyl amide p38 kinase inhibitors 4: DFG-in and DFG-out binding modes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
44
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
4
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Inhibitors that engage this DFG pocket in p38␣ exhibit significantly slower association and dissociation binding kinetics (Pargellis et al, 2002) relative to the classical ATP competitive inhibitors. Interactions with this DFG-out pocket in p38␣, although generally enhancing compound affinity, may result in decreased selectivity for kinase inhibitors (Angell et al, 2008). Interpretation of p38 kinase-driven biology by using highly selective inhibitors such as PH-797804 is more conclusive than studies using earlier generation p38 inhibitors in which significant kinase crossover was observed (Karaman et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inhibitors that engage this DFG pocket in p38␣ exhibit significantly slower association and dissociation binding kinetics (Pargellis et al, 2002) relative to the classical ATP competitive inhibitors. Interactions with this DFG-out pocket in p38␣, although generally enhancing compound affinity, may result in decreased selectivity for kinase inhibitors (Angell et al, 2008). Interpretation of p38 kinase-driven biology by using highly selective inhibitors such as PH-797804 is more conclusive than studies using earlier generation p38 inhibitors in which significant kinase crossover was observed (Karaman et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The urea/amide moiety of the allosteric inhibitors is considered to be fundamental for the DFG flip 11 triggered by the establishment of two specific H-bonds with residues D 168 (belonging to the activation loop) and residue E 71 (belonging to Helix-C). 12,13 Whereas the hypothesis of a DFG-out conformation induced by allosteric inhibitors is generally supported by the results of X-ray experiments and by their slow binding kinetics experimentally observed, 14,12 the existence of a dynamic equilibrium between the DFG-in and DFG-out conformations of p38a in its apo and complexed form has been first advanced on the basis of the results of NMR studies. 15 The authors hypothesize that the DFG-out state is sampled less frequently than the DFG-in conformation; type-II inhibitors bind to the DFG-out form, freezing the protein in this conformation and suppressing the conformational exchange, while the binding of traditional inhibitors (ATP-site binders) affects the DFG equilibrium to a lesser extent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that even small changes in ligand structure can often have very dramatic affects on activity confirming subtle interactions are often at play [1,2]. An ability to more effectively understand and predict these subtleties is one of the next challenges in SBD which will allow now routinely determined 3D crystallographic coordinates to be used in a more quantitative fashion to guide the structural modification of a lead series [3,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%