2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2019.02.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biphasic reaction of glycerol and oleic acid: Byproducts formation and phase transfer autocatalytic effect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our previously published review [8] on glycerolysis of oleic acid (OA), the FFA conversion rate is higher initially when the MO yield is also higher, irrespective of the reaction being catalyzed or non-catalyzed. The presence of MO dictating the conversion of OA in the glycerolysis reaction has been recently well established by the work of Gomes et al [9]. MO, an ester of OA, was found to act as a phase transfer agent, accelerating the reaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our previously published review [8] on glycerolysis of oleic acid (OA), the FFA conversion rate is higher initially when the MO yield is also higher, irrespective of the reaction being catalyzed or non-catalyzed. The presence of MO dictating the conversion of OA in the glycerolysis reaction has been recently well established by the work of Gomes et al [9]. MO, an ester of OA, was found to act as a phase transfer agent, accelerating the reaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…MO, an ester of OA, was found to act as a phase transfer agent, accelerating the reaction. Given the evidence [9], it is intuitive that the glycerolysis biphasic system's reaction kinetics will be impacted by this changing phase behavior, and thus is worthwhile of an investigation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2a, c, and e), reaching 54.90 ± 3.32 g/100 g glycerol-free product at 40 °C, 59.31 ± 2.14 g/100 g at 50 °C, and 60.97 ± 0.15 g/100 g at 60 °C. This was possible because a higher reaction temperature increases both the rate of reaction and the mutual miscibility of reactants, leading to higher conversions and more products [45]. Also, maximum selectivity for both DG (S DG ) and PG (S PG ) occurred earlier but within a narrower period as the temperature was increased (Fig.…”
Section: Effect Of Temperature and Molar Ratio On Conversion Distribu...mentioning
confidence: 99%