1972
DOI: 10.1016/0014-4886(72)90071-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biphasic development of muscle fibers in the fetal lamb

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

7
39
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
7
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the bovine, the presence of the IGFII mRNA and both the IGFs receptors coincides with muscle differentiation [35]. This coincidence is found in other species such as in the ovine [2,34], in the porcine [3,25], and in the murine species [4,38]. Thus, in muscle cells, in vivo, IGF-11 might act as an autocrine pathway on muscle cell differentiation, as has been shown in vitro by Florini et al.…”
supporting
confidence: 55%
“…In the bovine, the presence of the IGFII mRNA and both the IGFs receptors coincides with muscle differentiation [35]. This coincidence is found in other species such as in the ovine [2,34], in the porcine [3,25], and in the murine species [4,38]. Thus, in muscle cells, in vivo, IGF-11 might act as an autocrine pathway on muscle cell differentiation, as has been shown in vitro by Florini et al.…”
supporting
confidence: 55%
“…Myotube development in the innervated soleus muscle (Ontell et al, 1988a1, as in other mammalian muscles (Ishikawa, 1966;Kelly and Zacks, 1969;Ashmore et al, 1972;Ontell and Kozeka, 1984a), is a biphasic phenomenon, involving discrete myogenic waves separated by a temporal delay of -2 days. At 14 days in utero (the time of laser ablation of the spinal cord in this study), the soleus muscle is a discrete muscle consisting of primary myotubes and mononucleated cells.…”
Section: Aneural Muscle Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vertebrate muscle development is a biphasic phenomenon, characterized by successive myogenic waves, resulting in two discrete populations of myotubes, referred to as primary (i.e., first-formed) and secondary myotubes (Ishikawa, 1966;Kelly and Zacks, 1969;Ashmore et al, 1972;Ontell and Kozeka, 1984a;Ontell et al, 1988a). In avian muscle, where access to the fetus in ovo permits experimental manipulations, it has been suggested that the formation of primary myotubes is nerve-independent, while the formation of secondary myotubes is nervedependent (Butler et al, 1982;McLennan, 1983;Phillips and Bennett, 1984;Crow and Stockdale, 1986; however, see Fredette and Landmesser, 1991).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several electron microscopic studies (e.g., lamb, Ashmore et al, 1972;pig, Ashmore et al, 1973) have described, in single section analyses, the general cellular characteristics of the developmental processes. Formation of primary and secondary myotubes appears to occur broadly as in small animals, although there has been no demonstration that primary myotubes necessarily form a continuous, full-length framework for the muscle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%