1989
DOI: 10.1049/el:19890227
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biphase linecoding in optical FSK heterodyne transmission experiment, without sensitivity degradation compared to NRZ

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1990
1990
1996
1996

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Manchester coding was used to avoid penalties due to the non flat FM response of the DFB lasers. For reasons of simplicity the Manchester signal was not decoded synchronously [8], but detected at the double bit rate of 311.04 Mb/s, which implies another 3-dB penalty. Data induced polarization switching (DIPS) was implemented with 180 m of highly birefringent (PANDA) fiber [7] with 2.8-ns/m birefringence, resulting in a 0.5 ns differential delay between the two principal polarizations.…”
Section: B Coherent Distributive Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Manchester coding was used to avoid penalties due to the non flat FM response of the DFB lasers. For reasons of simplicity the Manchester signal was not decoded synchronously [8], but detected at the double bit rate of 311.04 Mb/s, which implies another 3-dB penalty. Data induced polarization switching (DIPS) was implemented with 180 m of highly birefringent (PANDA) fiber [7] with 2.8-ns/m birefringence, resulting in a 0.5 ns differential delay between the two principal polarizations.…”
Section: B Coherent Distributive Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to have an acceptable spacing between these channels (in the order of a few gigahertz), narrow deviation CPFSK has been chosen as modulation format, which makes the application of DIPS less suitable. For this reason, we have chosen for the principle of polarization diversity, which yields the highest receiver sensitivity without the need of active polarization control [8].…”
Section: Coherent Communicative Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%