2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.automatica.2017.01.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bipartite containment tracking of signed networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
67
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
67
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…From [21], we give the following definition of containment in signed graphs. Let us denote by L the set of nodes directly controlled by the leaders, that is,…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From [21], we give the following definition of containment in signed graphs. Let us denote by L the set of nodes directly controlled by the leaders, that is,…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results were later extended to the case of non-strongly connected graphs and discrete-time dynamics [16]- [20]. Recently, a first definition of containment control over signed graphs was given in [21]. Specifically, the author says that a network is contained when the states of its nodes converge towards the convex hull spanned by the leaders and by their symmetric trajectories.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, the coordination control of nonlinear signed networks has not received enough attention. Note that the signed networks in most of current works [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33] are assumed to be composed by identical linear systems. In recent years, some attention has been paid to the coordination control of signed networks with nonlinear dynamics: Hu et al 47 considered the traditional synchronization problem for signed networks with Lipschitz-type node dynamics; Zhai et al [48][49][50] studied the bipartite leaderless and leader-following synchronization in a network of nonlinear systems satisfying the one-sided Lipschitz condition.…”
Section: Main Motivationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To extend the results of first‐order signed networks, some researchers considered the bipartite consensus of signed networks with more general agent dynamics: Hu and Zhu considered the bipartite leader‐following consensus of multiagent systems with second‐order dynamics; Valcher and Misra discussed the bipartite consensus of high‐order multiagent systems; Zhang and Chen studied the bipartite consensus problem for multiagent systems with general linear dynamics based on state‐ and output‐feedback control approaches. In recent years, other types of collective behaviors of signed networks have also been investigated: Fan et al considered the bipartite flocking of second‐order multiagent systems under signed graphs; Meng addressed the bipartite containment control of signed networks with multiple leaders.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, multi-agent systems have great potential of application in the fields of biology, engineering, physics, society and so on. Also its distributed cooperative control [1,2] has attracted more and more researchers' attention. For example, the controllability [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] and the consensus problem [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] are widely studied in multi-agent systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%