2016
DOI: 10.1124/dmd.116.069377
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biotransformation Capacity of Carboxylesterase in Skin and Keratinocytes for the Penta-Ethyl Ester Prodrug of DTPA

Abstract: The penta-ethyl ester prodrug of the chelating agent diethylene triamine pentaacetic acid (DTPA), referred to as C2E5, effectively accelerated clearance of americium after transdermal delivery. Carboxylesterases (CESs) play important roles in facilitating C2E5 hydrolysis. However, whether CESs in human skin hydrolyze C2E5 remains unknown. We evaluated the gene and protein expression of CESs in distinctive human epidermal cell lines: HEKa, HEKn, HaCaT, and A431. The substrates p-nitrophenyl acetate (pNPA) and 4… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results clearly show that MKH derivatives and MK-4 increase intracellular MKO levels in the keratinocyte cell line we used, indicating that they could be used to deliver MKH into keratinocytes, where it then acts as a cofactor for GGCX. We previously showed that MKH-DMG and MKH-SUC reconvert to MKH in a reaction catalyzed by carboxyl esterase [17], which is present in dermal cells [19,20,21], so accelerated intracellular reconversion to a parent drug is possible. Although UVA-irradiated MK-4 did not increase intracellular MKO, UVA-irradiated MKH derivatives were able to.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results clearly show that MKH derivatives and MK-4 increase intracellular MKO levels in the keratinocyte cell line we used, indicating that they could be used to deliver MKH into keratinocytes, where it then acts as a cofactor for GGCX. We previously showed that MKH-DMG and MKH-SUC reconvert to MKH in a reaction catalyzed by carboxyl esterase [17], which is present in dermal cells [19,20,21], so accelerated intracellular reconversion to a parent drug is possible. Although UVA-irradiated MK-4 did not increase intracellular MKO, UVA-irradiated MKH derivatives were able to.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cell viability tests indicated that 1-OMe-OP potently inhibits the cancer cells that downregulate CES (e.g., OVSAHO) but is innocuous to the cells that upregulate CES (e.g., HepG2), while those two cell lines exhibit comparable phosphatase activities. Control experiments (the addition of esterase inhibitors 20 ) confirmed that the action and expression level of CES are critical for selectively inhibiting the cancer cells. A dicarboxyl methyl ester analogue of 1-OMe-OP validated the generality of the concept.…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…To prove further that CES hydrolysis contributes to the low cytotoxicity of 1-OMe-OP against HepG2, we coincubated CES inhibitors and 1-OMe-OP with HepG2 (Figure 3B). The addition of troglitazone (a CES1 inhibitor 20 ) or loperamide (a CES2 inhibitor 22 ) reduced the IC 50 of 1-OMe-OP against HepG2 from 338 μM to 133 μM and 117 μM, respectively. BNPP (an inhibitor of both CES1 and CES2 23 ) lowered the IC 50 of 1-OMe-OP against HepG2 by almost an order of magnitude (from 338 μM to 43 μM).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The significant difference in biotransformation capacity among the three skin cell lines is ascribable to the different levels of expression and activity between immortalized and primary cell cultures. 29 Furthermore, in order to evaluate the role of human carboxylesterases (hCEs) in the hydrolysis, the four selected compounds were incubated in the presence of recombinant hCE isoforms 1 and 2 (Table 3). Whereas nonspecific esterase activity has been demonstrated in human skin and cultured skin cells, investigations into the expression of specific CEs in skin were controversial in the literature.…”
Section: ■ Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%