2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.10.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biotope mapping in an urban environment and its implications for urban management in Turkey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(24 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These elements reduce or provide specific ecosystem services. Due to the development of remote-sensing technologies and geographical information systems (GIS), biotope mapping has improved through quick and accurate mapping methods (Ehlers et al 2003; Mansuroglu et al 2006). However, traditional mapping methods incorporate only land cover aspects when mapping and assessing ES using GIS or remote sensing (Troy and Wilson 2006; Burkhard et al 2009) and disregard use and accessibility aspects of mapped elements.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These elements reduce or provide specific ecosystem services. Due to the development of remote-sensing technologies and geographical information systems (GIS), biotope mapping has improved through quick and accurate mapping methods (Ehlers et al 2003; Mansuroglu et al 2006). However, traditional mapping methods incorporate only land cover aspects when mapping and assessing ES using GIS or remote sensing (Troy and Wilson 2006; Burkhard et al 2009) and disregard use and accessibility aspects of mapped elements.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…P, Fe, Zn and Mn contents were found significantly higher in 0-5 cm soil depth on skidroad. In 5-10 cm soil depth, concentrations Areas under great population pressure due to tourism developments, Turkey [32] Under disturbed Q. pyrenaica ecosystems by human intervention, Spain [35] Restoration success in alluvial grasslands under contrasting flooding regimes, Germany [36] In reclaimed area contaminated with dioxin, Italy [23] On xerothermic calcareous grassland after heavy disturbance, Germany [37] Around villages in Sakarya province, Turkey [29] Rubus discolor Weihe et Nees.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both of them cover Europe entirely, showing great advantages through regular updates (every six to 10 years); (ii) at the national level: e.g., Natura 2000 (N2K) for 2006 and 2012 across 28 EU nations; (iii) at the state or municipal level: e.g., Urban Atlas (UA) datasets and biotope mapping (based on aerial photography and ground investigations of individual habitats). For biotope mapping, internationally, there is a rising number of biotope mappings in countries such as South Korea [44], Turkey [45], China [46], and Norway [47]. For a country like Germany, where the biotope mapping has had a long-standing tradition of more than 45 years, RS orbital and aerial images are of great value, because they support the classification system of biotope types at one point in time over a large space.…”
Section: Selected Indicator Framework For Amgimentioning
confidence: 99%