2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00253-020-10514-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biotechnology progress for removal of indoor gaseous formaldehyde

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 106 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the scientific consensus is that the rhizosphere is the main proprietor for VOC removal (Torpy et al 2013 ), the entire potted ecosystem is required for effective VOC removal, with the symbiotic relationship governed by the plant providing the structure and chemical signalling for the rhizospheric bacteria (Hirsch and Fujishige 2012 ; Kim et al 2014 ; Shao et al 2020 ; Wood et al 2002 ; Xu et al 2011 ). As the phytoremediation potential of these systems is biologically driven, several studies have observed a notable increase VOC removal efficiency with repeat exposure to a single VOC due to specific biostimulation of the bioremediation-active rhizospheric microbial community (Orwell et al 2004 ; Torpy et al 2013 ; Wood et al 2006 ).…”
Section: Plants As a Phytoremediation Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the scientific consensus is that the rhizosphere is the main proprietor for VOC removal (Torpy et al 2013 ), the entire potted ecosystem is required for effective VOC removal, with the symbiotic relationship governed by the plant providing the structure and chemical signalling for the rhizospheric bacteria (Hirsch and Fujishige 2012 ; Kim et al 2014 ; Shao et al 2020 ; Wood et al 2002 ; Xu et al 2011 ). As the phytoremediation potential of these systems is biologically driven, several studies have observed a notable increase VOC removal efficiency with repeat exposure to a single VOC due to specific biostimulation of the bioremediation-active rhizospheric microbial community (Orwell et al 2004 ; Torpy et al 2013 ; Wood et al 2006 ).…”
Section: Plants As a Phytoremediation Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cost and environmental impact of storage and incineration of wood waste such as wood impregnated with Cu-based preservative or fiber based panel board (MDF, HDF) are very high, and recycling or upcycling of these waste has great potential on global warming and carbon sequestration in wood industry [ 41 , 42 ]. Considerable efforts of research have been carried out to explore the bioremediation potential of wood decay bacteria and fungi in the contaminant’s removal from wood or water effluents [ 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 ]. Several studies have shown that fungi and bacteria are tolerant to different constituents of preservatives such as copper [ 48 ], CCA, and creosote [ 49 , 50 ].…”
Section: Biological Wood Decontaminationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several methods, such as plant absorption, physical absorption, and chemical method , have been proposed for the removal of formaldehyde in the past decades. Using plant’s absorption and physical absorption methods to remove formaldehyde is slow, non-specific, and less efficient. ,,, Catalytic oxidization is one of the chemical methods for formaldehyde decomposition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%