2015
DOI: 10.5897/ajar2014.9323
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biotechnology in agriculture: The perception of farmers on the inclusion of Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) in agricultural production

Abstract: The aim of this study was to determine the perceptions and attitudes towards biotechnology in the insertion of genetically modified (GM) crop production. The data analyzed in this article were obtained through qualitative research, via a semi-structured questionnaire administered in June 2014, with 20 associated cooperatives of farmers at Campos Gerais region. It was found, from the speech of farmers, there are advantages and disadvantages of biotechnology in agriculture, and all point to transgenic technology… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of late, consumer resistance has also been identified as a major constraint to GM crop production by farmers. 33 Clustered regularly interspaced short palindrome repeats (CRISPR) have been developed to counter such negative sentiments associated with a genetically modified organism. This is due to the fact that they are easier to design and implement, have a higher success rate, are more versatile and less expensive compared to the genetically modified organisms and other new breeding techniques(NBTs) such as zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs) and transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs).…”
Section: Producer Acceptance Of Gm Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of late, consumer resistance has also been identified as a major constraint to GM crop production by farmers. 33 Clustered regularly interspaced short palindrome repeats (CRISPR) have been developed to counter such negative sentiments associated with a genetically modified organism. This is due to the fact that they are easier to design and implement, have a higher success rate, are more versatile and less expensive compared to the genetically modified organisms and other new breeding techniques(NBTs) such as zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs) and transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs).…”
Section: Producer Acceptance Of Gm Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%