1983
DOI: 10.4039/ent1151627-12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

BIOSYSTEMATICS OF PISSODES GERMAR (COLEOPTERA: CURCULIONIDAE): FEEDING PREFERENCE AND BREEDING SITE SPECIFICITY OF P. STROBI AND P. APPROXIMATUS

Abstract: Pissodes strobi (Peck) and P. approximatus Hopkins are sibling species that can produce fertile hybrids in the laboratory, but in nature they are isolated by differences in their breeding habits. In a laboratory assay for feeding preference, these species exhibited similar patterns of acceptance of most conifer hosts in the fall, but differed distinctly in their preferences for certain conifers in the spring. Both species had high levels of feeding on white spruce in the fall and spring tests, hut these data a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, white spruce is attacked in the eastern boreal region, and a variety of P. glauca is commonly attacked in western North America (Stevenson 1967;Smith and Sugden 1969). Phillips and Lanier (1983) found that white spruce was preferred over five other hosts in a choice feeding test using New York P. strobi; such tests apparently may not reflect host preferences as they occur in nature. Red pine was not susceptible to attack in our study, although red pine is reported to be attacked by the weevil in the Great Lakes states (Frank Morse,l pers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, white spruce is attacked in the eastern boreal region, and a variety of P. glauca is commonly attacked in western North America (Stevenson 1967;Smith and Sugden 1969). Phillips and Lanier (1983) found that white spruce was preferred over five other hosts in a choice feeding test using New York P. strobi; such tests apparently may not reflect host preferences as they occur in nature. Red pine was not susceptible to attack in our study, although red pine is reported to be attacked by the weevil in the Great Lakes states (Frank Morse,l pers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although much attention has been given to examining weevil resistance of preferred hosts of P. strobi (for example, Wilkinson 1980), most reports of the impact of the weevil on infrequently attacked hosts are based on casual observations. Phillips and Lanier (1983) examined the feeding of P. strobi and that of a sibling species, P. approximatus, in a laboratory test. When given a choice of lateral branch sections from six different species of conifers, P. strobi fed the most on white spruce, Picea glauca.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CHC compositions of both sexes of both species were distinct in the spring (Figure 2). However, in summer, when breeding site specificity may no longer prevent interspecific contact [24], the CHC profiles of the females of both species did not separate on the first discriminant function, whereas those of the males did. The similarity between the female CHCs could fail to prevent hybridization between these species during the summer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These two weevil species are morphologically similar and can mate, resulting in hybrid offspring [21,22,23]. In early spring, adult weevils of both species emerge from their overwintering sites in the forest floor, feed, mate and lay eggs on their own habits [19,24]. Pissodes strobi emerge, then feed and oviposit on leaders, whereas P. nemorensis feed and oviposit on slash and the lower stems of healthy and unhealthy trees [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oviposition decreased sharply after day 150 as many females died and the remainder produced fewer and fewer eggs. Changing host quality is the most likely reason for the decline and resurgence of the m, values between days 70 and 130 (ODell 1972;Phillips and Lanier 1983). Unfortunately, our data do not permit us to determine whether the changes are the result of random variation in the selection of host material, real changes in host quality associated with weather or season, or degradation of the nutritional components during the handling and storage of the shoots.…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%