2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10340-018-1001-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biosurveillance of forest insects: part II—adoption of genomic tools by end user communities and barriers to integration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the advantages that metabarcoding may offer to insect surveillance programs, uptake of new diagnostic tools into operational use depends on more than just the cost-effectiveness of the tool, but also on factors such as ease of use, accuracy, reproducibility, and perceived usefulness to the end users, as well as compatibility with existing policy frameworks [46, 47]. With the introduction of the World Trade Organisation Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary measures (SPS) came new obligations for exporting nations to demonstrate freedom of a geographic area from particular pests using scientifically rigorous surveillance practices [48].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the advantages that metabarcoding may offer to insect surveillance programs, uptake of new diagnostic tools into operational use depends on more than just the cost-effectiveness of the tool, but also on factors such as ease of use, accuracy, reproducibility, and perceived usefulness to the end users, as well as compatibility with existing policy frameworks [46, 47]. With the introduction of the World Trade Organisation Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary measures (SPS) came new obligations for exporting nations to demonstrate freedom of a geographic area from particular pests using scientifically rigorous surveillance practices [48].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accurate detection of invasive pathogens is a hallmark of efficient prevention and integrated pest management programs [42,43]. In some instance assessing pathogen viability may even be more crucial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous molecular diagnostic tools have been developed in recent years for use in clinical settings, and there has been a push to apply similar tools to invasive species management. In particular, there are opportunities to use genomic tools for invasive species biosurveillance (e.g., for managing forest pests; Bilodeau et al 2018;Roe et al 2018). The use of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) for invasive species identification is well-established (Lyal and Miller 2019, this issue), but limited in application because relatively few species have been genetically sequenced and profiled in open access information systems, including GenBank, the National Institute of Health (NIH) annotated collection of all publicly available gene sequences (Benson et al 2013), or the other international databases with which GenBank interfaces (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank, accessed 30 October 2019).…”
Section: Genetic Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%