Abstract:The growing global demand for sustainable technologies that improves the efficiency of petrochemical processes in the oil industry has driven advances in petroleum biotechnology in recent years. Petroleum industry uses substantial amounts of petrochemical-based synthetic surfactants in its activities as mobilizing agents to increase the availability or recovery of hydrocarbons as well as many other applications related to extraction, treatment, cleaning, and transportation. However, biosurfactants have several… Show more
“…The soil and sludge samples, in contrary to the injection water samples, contained higher numbers of the PAH-degrading nahA gene and less numbers of the SRB apsA gene. The aerobic conditions, the limitation of the terminal electron acceptor SO 4 and the proper electron donors in the soil samples, compared with the injection water, might explain the low number of SRB. Generally, the SRB in soil and sludge samples collected from the GOSP might have been originated due to contamination by the produced water or crude oil.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It exploits the astonishing metabolic capabilities of a variety of dedicated microorganisms [1,2]. The latter include sulfate-reducers, hydrocarbon-degrading/transforming, biosurfactants-producing bacteria, etc [3,4]. Sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) constitute a group of anaerobic microbes, which utilize sulfate as a terminal electron acceptor for the degradation of organic compounds.…”
“…The soil and sludge samples, in contrary to the injection water samples, contained higher numbers of the PAH-degrading nahA gene and less numbers of the SRB apsA gene. The aerobic conditions, the limitation of the terminal electron acceptor SO 4 and the proper electron donors in the soil samples, compared with the injection water, might explain the low number of SRB. Generally, the SRB in soil and sludge samples collected from the GOSP might have been originated due to contamination by the produced water or crude oil.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It exploits the astonishing metabolic capabilities of a variety of dedicated microorganisms [1,2]. The latter include sulfate-reducers, hydrocarbon-degrading/transforming, biosurfactants-producing bacteria, etc [3,4]. Sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) constitute a group of anaerobic microbes, which utilize sulfate as a terminal electron acceptor for the degradation of organic compounds.…”
“…They are usually classified into low molecular weight compounds (lipopeptides, glycolipids) and high molecular weight polymers [6]. Thanks to their unique properties, such as low toxicity, functionality under extreme conditions, biodegradable nature, and specific action, biosurfactants have several potential applications in the petroleum industry, mainly for the so-called microbial enhanced oil recovery (MEOR) [7][8][9]. Up to now, a major role in MEOR techniques was played by rhamnolipid, sophorolipid, glycolipid and lipopeptide biosurfactants [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thanks to their unique properties, such as low toxicity, functionality under extreme conditions, biodegradable nature, and specific action, biosurfactants have several potential applications in the petroleum industry, mainly for the so-called microbial enhanced oil recovery (MEOR) [7][8][9]. Up to now, a major role in MEOR techniques was played by rhamnolipid, sophorolipid, glycolipid and lipopeptide biosurfactants [7]. Three main strategies can be adopted for using biosurfactants in EOR processes or mobilization of heavy oils: (i) direct injection of biosurfactant-producing microorganisms into the reservoir through the well, followed by their in situ multiplication through the reservoir rocks; (ii) ex situ injection of selected nutrients into a reservoir, to stimulate the growth of biosurfactant-producing microorganisms; (iii) external production of biosurfactants and their subsequent injection into the reservoir.…”
Enhancing oil recovery from currently available reservoirs is a major issue for petroleum companies. Among the possible strategies towards this, chemical flooding through injection of surfactants into the wells seems to be particularly promising, thanks to their ability to reduce oil/water interfacial tension that promotes oil mobilization. Environmental concerns about the use of synthetic surfactants led to a growing interest in their replacement with surfactants of biological origin, such as lipopeptides and glycolipids produced by several microorganisms. Hydrophobins are small amphiphilic proteins produced by filamentous fungi with high surface activity and good emulsification properties, and may represent a novel sustainable tool for this purpose. We report here a thorough study of their stability and emulsifying performance towards a model hydrocarbon mixture, in conditions that mimic those of real oil reservoirs (high salinity and high temperature). Due to the moderate interfacial tension reduction induced in such conditions, the application of hydrophobins in enhanced oil recovery techniques does not appear feasible at the moment, at least in absence of co-surfactants. On the other hand, the obtained results showed the potential of hydrophobins in promoting the formation of a gel-like emulsion 'barrier' at the oil/water interface.
“…Dispersion is a process by which a hydrocarbon is dispersed into the aqueous phase as very small emulsions. Dispersion is related to both the interfacial tension and surfactant concentration, and differs from displacement in that displacement process is only related to the interfacial tension between aqueous and hydrophobic phases and no emulsion formation (Almeida et al, 2016). In this study, the biosurfactant from C. tropicalis UCP0996 was tested as an oil dispersant in seawater.…”
Biosurfactant production optimization by Candida tropicalis UCP0996 was studied combining central composite rotational design (CCRD) and response surface methodology (RSM). The factors selected for optimization of the culture conditions were sugarcane molasses, corn steep liquor, waste frying oil concentrations and inoculum size. The response variables were surface tension and biosurfactant yield. All factors studied were important within the ranges investigated. The two empirical forecast models developed through RSM were found to be adequate for describing biosurfactant production with regard to surface tension (R2 = 0.99833) and biosurfactant yield (R2 = 0.98927) and a very strong, negative, linear correlation was found between the two response variables studied (r = −0.95). The maximum reduction in surface tension and the highest biosurfactant yield were 29.98 mNm−1 and 4.19 gL−1, respectively, which were simultaneously obtained under the optimum conditions of 2.5% waste frying oil, 2.5%, corn steep liquor, 2.5% molasses, and 2% inoculum size. To validate the efficiency of the statistically optimized variables, biosurfactant production was also carried out in 2 and 50 L bioreactors, with yields of 5.87 and 7.36 gL−1, respectively. Finally, the biosurfactant was applied in motor oil dispersion, reaching up to 75% dispersion. Results demonstrated that the CCRD was suitable for identifying the optimum production conditions and that the new biosurfactant is a promising dispersant for application in the oil industry.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.