2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2016.07.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biostratigraphy, palaeogeography and palaeoenvironmental significance of Sorex runtonensis Hinton, 1911 (Mammalia, Soricidae): First record from the Iberian Peninsula

Abstract: Sorex runtonensis (Mammalia, Soricidae) is a well-known Pleistocene taxon with a broad distribution in Europe. However, no record of the species had been reported from the Iberian Peninsula up to now. Here we present nearly two hundred specimens of S. runtonensis recovered from the Lower Red Unit (levels TE7-14) of Sima del Elefante (Sierra de Atapuerca, Burgos, Spain), dated to ~1.1-1.5 Ma. Rigorous morphometrical and morphological analyses allowed the assignation of the items from Sima del Elefante confident… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The oldest representative of this group may be: (1) S . runtonensis known from the Early (MN17, 2.6–1.9 Mya) to the Late Pleistocene in Europe and Caucasus Mountains [ 86 , 89 , 90 ], or (2) an earlier Sorex form Pliocene of Europe (MN15-MN16, 4.2–2.6 Mya), resembling S . runtonensis [ 86 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The oldest representative of this group may be: (1) S . runtonensis known from the Early (MN17, 2.6–1.9 Mya) to the Late Pleistocene in Europe and Caucasus Mountains [ 86 , 89 , 90 ], or (2) an earlier Sorex form Pliocene of Europe (MN15-MN16, 4.2–2.6 Mya), resembling S . runtonensis [ 86 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They may represent ancestors or old remains of the lineages leading to current species. Other detailed studies are required to solve the taxonomic position of these two taxa [ 89 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite individual variability, S. runtonensis can be easily distinguished from S. subaraneus and S. araneus. Therefore, the suggestion of Rofes et al (2016) on the unity of the S. subaraneus and S. runtonensis does not seem justifiable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…On the other hand, Rofes et al (2016) thought that two fossil taxa, S. subaraneus and S. runtonensis Hinton, 1911, described from the Early Pleistocene of West Runton (England) could be regarded as "a morphological continuum of the same species" and the name "runtonensis" would have priority. This study also questioned the validity of S. subaraneus species and in consequence its probability as the ancestor of S. araneus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both of the species were described from Valerots, France and from Deutsch-Altenburg 2C, Austria. Th ere were some transitional specimens found in Untermassfeld, Germany, and those are considered (2013,2015); Garcia et al (2014);Huguet et al (2017); Rofes et al (2016) Fragmenta Palaeontologica Hungarica 33, 2016 as S. margaritodon-savini. In Figure 6 is visible that the areas of the two species do not separate from each other in time and space (Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%