2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.01.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biosorption of hexavalent chromium by Termitomyces clypeatus biomass: Kinetics and transmission electron microscopic study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
28
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
3
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Shen and Wang (1993) also reported a stimulation of Cr 6+ reduction by 2,4-DNP in intact cells of E. coli ATCC 33456. However, contrary to these results, Das and Guha (2009) observed significantly reduced uptake of Cr 6+ by Termitomyces clypeatus in the presence of 2,4-DNP, while nickel ion transport was reported to be inhibited in Rhodospirillum rubrum by 2,4-DNP (Watt and Ludden 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Shen and Wang (1993) also reported a stimulation of Cr 6+ reduction by 2,4-DNP in intact cells of E. coli ATCC 33456. However, contrary to these results, Das and Guha (2009) observed significantly reduced uptake of Cr 6+ by Termitomyces clypeatus in the presence of 2,4-DNP, while nickel ion transport was reported to be inhibited in Rhodospirillum rubrum by 2,4-DNP (Watt and Ludden 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…6E), which indicates a main strategy for mycorrhizal roots to tolerate Cr(VI). Similar to extraradical mycelium mentioned above, Cr(VI) was possibly reduced by electron-donor compounds or chromate reductase in both fungal structures or plant cells [27,51,61]. Cr(III) is easily bound to phosphate, carboxyl or thiol groups, resulting in lower mobility and toxicity [27].…”
Section: Cellular Imaging and Speciation Of Cr In Resin Sections Of Mmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…In this experiment, SO 4 2− may be a competitive ion for the uptake of CrO 4 2− , because the Cr (VI)-reduction rate decreased correspondingly. Das and Guha [35] also reported that the uptake of chromium by live biomass was reduced in presence of sulfate ion. The existence of NO 3 − also decreased the Cr (VI)-reduction rate but the mechanism may be different from SO 4 2− , because NO 3 − could act as another competing electron acceptor, similar to oxygen [31].…”
Section: Effect Of Cr (Vi) Concentrationsmentioning
confidence: 90%