2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2004.08.167
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biosorption of chromium(VI) and arsenic(V) onto methylated yeast biomass

Abstract: Yeast biomass was methylated in a 0.1 M HCl methyl alcohol solution at room temperature and the methylated yeast (MeYE) was applied to the adsorptive separation of Cr(VI) and As(V) anions from aqueous solutions.At near neutral pH, while Cr(VI) and As(V) anions were scarcely adsorbed onto unmethylated yeast biomass, their adsorbed amounts increased with increasing methylation degree. The amount of Cr(VI) adsorbed onto MeYE was almost constant at pH4 -6 and decreased with increasing pH above pH 6. The adsorbed a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
47
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
47
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nowadays, there is a trend to use the alternative and low-cost materials for arsenic removal from the waters in laboratory or medium-scale experiments. Effectiveness of chemically modified or native biomass in processes of arsenic removal was evaluated and proved by various authors (Abdel-Ghani et al, 2007;Boddu et al, 2008;Cernansky et al, 2007;Loukidou et al, 2003;Malakootian et al, 2009;Murugesan et al, 2006;Rahaman et al, 2008;Seki et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, there is a trend to use the alternative and low-cost materials for arsenic removal from the waters in laboratory or medium-scale experiments. Effectiveness of chemically modified or native biomass in processes of arsenic removal was evaluated and proved by various authors (Abdel-Ghani et al, 2007;Boddu et al, 2008;Cernansky et al, 2007;Loukidou et al, 2003;Malakootian et al, 2009;Murugesan et al, 2006;Rahaman et al, 2008;Seki et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most prominent features of biosorption are the use of low cost and highly efficient biomass materials to adsorb heavy metals even present at very low concentrations (Yu et al, 2001). Various types of biomass, including bacteria (Scott and Palmer, 1990;Chang et al, 1997;Selatnia et al, 2004;Iyer et al, 2005), yeast (Huang et al, 1990;Volesky et al, 1993;Seki et al, 2005;Göksungur et al, 2005), fungi (Lewis and Kriff, 1988;Fourest et al, 1994;Dursun et al, 2003;Pal et al, 2006;Tunali et al, 2006), and algae (Xue et al, 1988;Yu et al, 1999;Lodeiro et al, 2005;Hansen et al, 2006;Vijayaraghavan et al, 2005Vijayaraghavan et al, , 2006, have been investigated with the aim of finding more efficient and cost-effective metal-removal biosorbent. Among them, marine algae with large available quantities in many regions are a kind of promising biological resources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physicochemical method are practiced and biological remediations are also taken into consideration [12][13][14][15]. Compared with physicochemical method, microbial remediation is more cost-effective and rarely introduces secondary pollution [16][17][18][19], especially for metal reduction in bioremediation. A wide variety of microorganisms capable of reducing aqueous hexavalent chromium ions have been reported including Staphylococcus epidermidis L-02 [11], Acinetobacter [20], Arthrobacter [21], Bacillus sp.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%