2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2008.05.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bioseparation of recombinant cellulose-binding module-proteins by affinity adsorption on an ultra-high-capacity cellulosic adsorbent

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
83
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
83
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the binding capacity of enzymes to RAC was 10 times higher than that to Avicel, which was similar to that reported by Hong et al [34]. The E max of wild-type and mutant AcCel12B to Avicel and RAC were not different from those of other cellulases [34,35]. Srisodsuk et al previously noted that the linker deletions of CBH I from Trichoderma reesei did not affect the enzyme affinity on crystalline cellulose at an initial enzyme concentration of 0.2 µM (5-9% saturation), but decreased the binding capacity as the enzyme concentration approached 10 µM [6].…”
Section: Adsorption and Desorption Of Wild-type And Mutant Accel12bsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, the binding capacity of enzymes to RAC was 10 times higher than that to Avicel, which was similar to that reported by Hong et al [34]. The E max of wild-type and mutant AcCel12B to Avicel and RAC were not different from those of other cellulases [34,35]. Srisodsuk et al previously noted that the linker deletions of CBH I from Trichoderma reesei did not affect the enzyme affinity on crystalline cellulose at an initial enzyme concentration of 0.2 µM (5-9% saturation), but decreased the binding capacity as the enzyme concentration approached 10 µM [6].…”
Section: Adsorption and Desorption Of Wild-type And Mutant Accel12bsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The E max (maximum adsorption capacities) of wild-type and mutant AcCel12B were not significantly different. Furthermore, the binding capacity of enzymes to RAC was 10 times higher than that to Avicel, which was similar to that reported by Hong et al [34]. The E max of wild-type and mutant AcCel12B to Avicel and RAC were not different from those of other cellulases [34,35].…”
Section: Adsorption and Desorption Of Wild-type And Mutant Accel12bsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The tub-ground materials were approximately 9 months old (harvested in fall 2005). The recombinant thioredoxin-green fluorescent protein-cellulose binding module (TGC) fusion protein was produced in Escherichia coli BL21 (pNT02) (Hong et al, 2007) and purified by affinity adsorption on RAC followed by modest desorption using ethyl glycol (EG) (Hong et al, 2008b). The EG was removed by using membrane dialysis in a 50 mM sodium citrate buffer (pH 6.0).…”
Section: Chemicals and Microorganismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This new approach more accurately assesses substrate characteristic related to enzymatic cellulose hydrolysis than traditional methods such as nitrogen adsorption-based Brunauer-EmmettTeller (BET), size exclusion, and small angle X-ray scattering (Hong et al, 2007;Zhang and Lynd, 2004). Regenerated amorphous cellulose (RAC) that is prepared from microcrystalline cellulose (Avicel) has $20-fold higher CAC (Hong et al, 2007(Hong et al, , 2008b and exhibits much faster enzymatic hydrolysis rates than microcrystalline cellulose (Zhang et al, 2006a), which is in agreement with the model prediction that increasing CAC is more important for increasing hydrolysis rates than decreasing DP (Zhang and Lynd, 2006). The CAC value of Avicel (m 2 per gram of Avicel) based on the TGC adsorption was only one-tenth of that based on the BET method (Marshall and Sixsmith, 1974), implying that about 90% gross surface area measure based on nitrogen adsorption cannot be accessible to largesize cellulase protein molecules, at least initially.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In reality, several low-cost scalable protein purification approaches are available, for example, simple centrifugation for secretory enzymes, adsorption/desorption on low-cost cellulosic materials [74,75] (Figure 5), heat precipitation for thermostable enzymes [65,76] (Figure 6), and ammonia precipitation [77] (Figure 6). Therefore, the purification costs for bulk enzymes would become relatively minor.…”
Section: Sypab Challenges and Opportunitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%