“…Notably, the authors of the encompassed studies characterized their biosensors as: silicon-based biosensors ( 22 , 23 , 25 ); based on nanoscale film on optical fiber ( 26 ); surface plasmon resonance biosensor ( 37 ); sensitive surface-enhanced Raman scattering biosensor ( 35 ); biosensors based on colorimetric assays ( 30 , 32 ) or on new nanocomposite materials ( 43 ); binary deoxyribozyme biosensor ( 27 ); electric and electrochemical biosensors ( 24 , 38 – 41 , 44 – 46 ); electrochemical aptasensor ( 34 ); conventional multiple cross displacement amplification technique combined with nanoparticle-based lateral flow biosensor ( 29 , 31 , 33 ), ultrasensitive nanophotonic bimodal waveguide interferometer ( 42 ), and biochip systems ( 28 , 36 ). Regarding the specimens employed in biosensor development and/or validation, 9 studies worked on clinical samples (e.g., human serum and urine samples) ( 22 , 25 , 26 , 28 , 35 , 36 , 38 , 44 , 46 ), while 13 on bacterial samples ( 23 , 24 , 29 , 30 , 32 , 33 , 37 , 39 – 43 , 45 ). Three studies used both clinical and bacterial samples ( 27 , 31 , 34 ).…”