2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-006-0574-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biosensors as useful tools for environmental analysis and monitoring

Abstract: Recent advances in the development and application of biosensors for environmental analysis and monitoring are reviewed in this article. Several examples of biosensors developed for relevant environmental pollutants and parameters are briefly overviewed. Special attention is paid to the application of biosensors to real environmental samples, taking into consideration aspects such as sample pretreatment, matrix effects and validation of biosensor measurements. Current trends in biosensor development are also c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
199
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 391 publications
(205 citation statements)
references
References 209 publications
0
199
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, coupling SPR to fiber optic (FO) technology triggered notable advancements in the field, by offering attractive advantages over the classical prism-based SPR platforms, such as simplicity, portability, cost-effectiveness and miniaturization [2]. FO-SPR sensors were successfully used already in a variety of applications, such as screening for bacterial infections [3], monitoring of environmental water pollution [4] or checking for specific toxins [5] and allergens [6] in food, among others. However, their performance still needs to be improved in order to match traditional prismbased SPR sensors, and consequently, to switch from laboratory proofs-of-principle to commercial products.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, coupling SPR to fiber optic (FO) technology triggered notable advancements in the field, by offering attractive advantages over the classical prism-based SPR platforms, such as simplicity, portability, cost-effectiveness and miniaturization [2]. FO-SPR sensors were successfully used already in a variety of applications, such as screening for bacterial infections [3], monitoring of environmental water pollution [4] or checking for specific toxins [5] and allergens [6] in food, among others. However, their performance still needs to be improved in order to match traditional prismbased SPR sensors, and consequently, to switch from laboratory proofs-of-principle to commercial products.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 ED can block cellular receptor sites or increase the production and/or secretion of hormones, hence interfering in the reproductive systems of living organisms. [3][4][5] Many compounds are suspected of interfering with the endocrine system, 6 including natural and synthetic estrogens (lipidsoluble steroid hormones) such as 17a-ethynylestradiol, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (compounds containing two or more conjugated aromatic rings, such as benzo(a) anthracene), polychlorinated biphenyls (highly toxic chlorinated compounds), pesticides (substances such as dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT), used to repel or eliminate pathogenic insects), and plasticisers such as bisphenol A that are used in polymeric plastics. 7 ED are conveyed to aquatic systems by various natural or anthropogenic mechanisms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such analyses only provide snapshots of the situation at the sampling site and time rather than more realistic information on spatio-temporal variations in water characteristics [2].…”
Section: Biosensor For Edcsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods involves the collection of water samples followed by laboratory-based instrumental analysis and such analyses only provide snapshots of the situation at the sampling site and time rather than more realistic information on spatio-temporal variations in water characteristics [2] One of the possibilities for a faster and timely measurement for pollutants in water, lies in the use of biosensors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%