2009
DOI: 10.4319/lom.2009.7.761
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biosensor for laboratory and lander‐based analysis of benthic nitrate plus nitrite distribution in marine environments

Abstract: We present a psychotropic bacteria-based biosensor that can be used in low-temperature seawater for the analysis of nitrate + nitrite (NO x -). The sensor can be used to resolve concentrations below 1 µmol L -1 at low temperature (<2.5°C) and high salinity (35‰), and in situ use in the deep sea was demonstrated by measuring NO x -profiles in sediment at 1500 m depth, where the temperature was 2.5°C. Analysis of marine sediment at 70 m depth showed very heterogeneous NO x -profiles, most of which exhibited pron… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, given the high density of infauna at the present study site, the microsensors were frequently damaged during the initial measurements, and we only obtained a total of 50 intact microprofiles during the 7 deployments. The O 2 sensors had a tip diameter of 1-5 lm, 90 % response time \0.5 s and stirring sensitivity \0.5 % (Revsbech 1989;Gundersen et al 1998), while typical NO 3 -sensors had an outer diameter of *150 lm, a 90 % response time of 1-2 min and were insensitive to stirring (Revsbech and Glud 2009). The sensors responded linearly towards solute concentrations, and the signals were calibrated against known concentrations in the bottom water and low readings in deep sediment layers that were presumed to be free of O 2 and NO 3 -.…”
Section: In Situ Microprofiling Instrumentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, given the high density of infauna at the present study site, the microsensors were frequently damaged during the initial measurements, and we only obtained a total of 50 intact microprofiles during the 7 deployments. The O 2 sensors had a tip diameter of 1-5 lm, 90 % response time \0.5 s and stirring sensitivity \0.5 % (Revsbech 1989;Gundersen et al 1998), while typical NO 3 -sensors had an outer diameter of *150 lm, a 90 % response time of 1-2 min and were insensitive to stirring (Revsbech and Glud 2009). The sensors responded linearly towards solute concentrations, and the signals were calibrated against known concentrations in the bottom water and low readings in deep sediment layers that were presumed to be free of O 2 and NO 3 -.…”
Section: In Situ Microprofiling Instrumentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sensors responded linearly towards solute concentrations, and the signals were calibrated against known concentrations in the bottom water and low readings in deep sediment layers that were presumed to be free of O 2 and NO 3 -. The NO 3 -microsensor is cross-sensitive to NO 2 -and N 2 O, but as the concentration of these solutes generally is well below 1 lmol L -1 in marine sediments, such potential interference was ignored (Revsbech and Glud 2009). Microprofiles were measured at a vertical resolution of 0.2 mm, and sensors were kept at each measuring depth for 2 min to ensure that the NO 3 -sensors had responded fully before recording the data.…”
Section: In Situ Microprofiling Instrumentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A significant positive correlation has been found earlier between OPC biovolumes and measured displacement volumes of preserved zooplankton samples, although OPC estimates tend to underestimate measured biomasses (Beaulieu et al 1999). LOPC estimates, on the other hand, seem to be only weakly correlated with the displacement volumes of entire size classes of particles (Schultes and Lopes 2009). The displacement volume method, which gives robust biomass estimates, has been described in detail by Schultes and Lopes (2009).…”
Section: Comparison Of Seston Dry Mass With Opc and Lopcderived Biomamentioning
confidence: 52%
“…The recently improved biosensors for NO 2 − and NO X − (NO 2 − + NO 3 − ) (Revsbech & Glud 2009) and O 2 microsensors were used to measure the concentrations and spatial distributions of NO 2 − , NO X − and O 2 in Ulva-amended sediment microcosms and in unamended controls during a 1 mo incubation experiment. NO X − profiles were modelled to study the effects of Ulva detritus enrichment on the vertical distribution and magnitude of nitrification and anaerobic NO X − consumption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%