2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10822-011-9439-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biosensor-based small molecule fragment screening with biolayer interferometry

Abstract: Biosensor-based fragment screening is a valuable tool in the drug discovery process. This method is advantageous over many biochemical methods because primary hits can be distinguished from non-specific or non-ideal interactions by examining binding profiles and responses, resulting in reduced false-positive rates. Biolayer interferometry (BLI), a technique that measures changes in an interference pattern generated from visible light reflected from an optical layer and a biolayer containing proteins of interes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
94
0
7

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(25 reference statements)
3
94
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Although there is little published data systematically comparing the performances of these varied approaches (ELISA, optical methods, ITC, etc. ), the few available studies suggest that the affinity constant estimations are similar across platforms (Myszka et al 2003;Wartchow et al 2011), whereas another study comparing ELISA with SPR concluded that they are not only consistent but also complementary (Heinrich et al 2010). This latter study is interesting because the ELISA distinguished two distinct binding populations in solution (high-and low-affinity constants), but the affinity constants obtained via SPR were dependent on whether binding occurred in solution or at the surface of the biosensor: A higher-affinity constant was detected under solution binding conditions and a lower one when the antibody was bound to the surface or the Biacore chip.…”
Section: Affinity: the Strength Of An Antibody-antigen Complexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there is little published data systematically comparing the performances of these varied approaches (ELISA, optical methods, ITC, etc. ), the few available studies suggest that the affinity constant estimations are similar across platforms (Myszka et al 2003;Wartchow et al 2011), whereas another study comparing ELISA with SPR concluded that they are not only consistent but also complementary (Heinrich et al 2010). This latter study is interesting because the ELISA distinguished two distinct binding populations in solution (high-and low-affinity constants), but the affinity constants obtained via SPR were dependent on whether binding occurred in solution or at the surface of the biosensor: A higher-affinity constant was detected under solution binding conditions and a lower one when the antibody was bound to the surface or the Biacore chip.…”
Section: Affinity: the Strength Of An Antibody-antigen Complexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To further evaluate the binding of EFN-4 to LAD-2, we used biolayer interferometry (BLI), an optical biosensing technique similar to surface plasmon resonance that can measure the association and disassociation of biomolecules (Abdiche et al, 2008;Wartchow et al, 2011;Wilson et al, 2010). In BLI assays, we immobilized EFN-4::Fc or the Fc control onto an anti-human Fc capture probe, after which we immersed the probe into conditioned tissue culture medium isolated from HEK293T cells transiently expressing the LAD-2 extracellular domain fused to alkaline phosphatase (LAD-2::AP).…”
Section: Lad-2 Biochemically Interacts With Efn-4mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ForteBio and Biacore biosensor-based binding assays provided similar results and were consistent with these findings. 23 The measured IC 50 and K D values were in the low micromolar range, making these low molecular weight series attractive starting points for development into a lead series (compounds 1.1, 2.1, 3.1, and 4.1; Table 1). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%