2007
DOI: 10.13031/2013.23636
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bioretention Column Study: Fecal Coliform and Total Suspended Solids Reductions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
1
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
30
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While this recipe provides ample hydraulic conductivity, good removal efficiencies for a number of pollutants, and adequate support for vegetative growth, traditional stormwater biofilters demonstrate poor microbial removal efficiency under field conditions, as reported by multiple case studies [40]. Log 10 removal of indicator bacteria in laboratory-scale sand biofilters varies [9,[41][42][43][44] from 0.45 to 2.5 depending on the filter media properties (e.g., particle size distribution, organic content and filter depth), stormwater composition, microbe strain, and biofilter operating conditions (e.g., extent of saturation, presence of vegetation). Lower microbial removal in these filter media under field conditions can be attributed to the complex operating conditions in the field, possible maintenance issues, such as clogging and short circuiting, stormwater overloading, and microbial regrowth.…”
Section: Filter Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this recipe provides ample hydraulic conductivity, good removal efficiencies for a number of pollutants, and adequate support for vegetative growth, traditional stormwater biofilters demonstrate poor microbial removal efficiency under field conditions, as reported by multiple case studies [40]. Log 10 removal of indicator bacteria in laboratory-scale sand biofilters varies [9,[41][42][43][44] from 0.45 to 2.5 depending on the filter media properties (e.g., particle size distribution, organic content and filter depth), stormwater composition, microbe strain, and biofilter operating conditions (e.g., extent of saturation, presence of vegetation). Lower microbial removal in these filter media under field conditions can be attributed to the complex operating conditions in the field, possible maintenance issues, such as clogging and short circuiting, stormwater overloading, and microbial regrowth.…”
Section: Filter Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several sites were selected for the site-specific assessment in terms of reduction in TP and sediment and implementation costs [20]. Water quality effects of stormwater BMPs were estimated by multiplying pollutant loads for urban lands and the corresponding pollutant reduction rates for each BMP found in the literature [11,23,24]. Implementation costs included installation and maintenance costs.…”
Section: Cost-effectiveness Of Stormwater Bmpsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typical total suspended solid (TSS) reductions of 90-98% have been reported (Rusciano and Obropta 2007;Li and Davis 2009) and as a result potential problems with media clogging exist. Li and Davis (2008) observed decreasing hydraulic conductivities over time in soil columns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A majority of rain garden research has been conducted in the laboratory with soil columns or constructed boxes (Davis et al 2001;Kim et al 2003;Hsieh and Davis 2005;Davis et al 2006;Hsieh et al 2007;Rusciano and Obropta 2007). Typically, higher rates of nutrient removal have been found in field studies (Dietz and Clausen 2005;Tornes 2005;Hunt et al 2006;Dietz and Clausen 2008;Passeport et al 2009); however, most of these studies have been conducted in a controlled environment in which synthetic stormwater and/or simulated rain events were applied to the rain gardens.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%