2020
DOI: 10.1186/s13019-020-1041-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bioresorbable vascular stents and drug-eluting stents in treatment of coronary heart disease: a meta-analysis

et al.

Abstract: Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of bioresorbable vascular stents (BVS) and drug-eluting stents (DES) in coronary heart disease. Methods: The full text of clinical studies involving BVS and DES was retrieved in PubMed, Springer, EMBASE, Wiley-Blackwell, and Chinese Journal Full-text Database. Review Manager 5.3 was used for meta-analysis to evaluate the risk of target lesion failure, stent thrombosis and cardiac death in BVS and DES. Results: Finally, 10 studies with 6383 patients were included in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it demonstrates excellent corrosion resistance and fatigue resistance, which are needed in the venous system to prevent stent restenosis. Therefore, iron-based materials have potential in the future application of venous resorbable stents [66,67] . Despite the fact that the initial effort of a BVS in the coronary system was not successful, the obtained experience and knowledge can be applied to its use in the venous system in the near future, since the incidence of late stent thrombosis may be low in the venous system [12] .…”
Section: Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffoldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it demonstrates excellent corrosion resistance and fatigue resistance, which are needed in the venous system to prevent stent restenosis. Therefore, iron-based materials have potential in the future application of venous resorbable stents [66,67] . Despite the fact that the initial effort of a BVS in the coronary system was not successful, the obtained experience and knowledge can be applied to its use in the venous system in the near future, since the incidence of late stent thrombosis may be low in the venous system [12] .…”
Section: Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffoldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It releases everolimus and is fully degraded to H 2 O and CO 2 in 2–3 years. BVS seems to offer several theoretical advantage over metallic stent, as it gives temporary mechanical support of vessel wall; therefore, long-term endothelial function and structure are not affected, and a possible future surgical revascularization is not compromised [ 31 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These types of scaffolds are not permanent, and their main advantage is that they offer temporary mechanical support in the vessel to prevent immediate restenosis and vascular recoil, while the long-term risk of complications due to the metallic stent matrix is eliminated. However, their superiority over DES is not yet clear, as long-term studies have not been conducted [ 9 , 12 , 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%