2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.07.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bioremediation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-contaminated saline–alkaline soils of the former Lake Texcoco

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
43
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
2
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fernández-Luqueño et al [6] reported that in soil of Texcoco with EC 30 dS m -1 or 80 dS m -1 , removal of Anthra was not affected by the application of wastewater sludge. However, Betancur-Galvis et al [15] found that the removal of Phen in wastewater sludge amended soil with EC 12 dS m -1 , and pH 10 was 54% compared to only 25% in the unamended soil after seven days and 71% and 29%, respectively, after 112 days. In the experiment reported here the wastewater sludge had less effect on the removal of Phen and Anthra than as reported by Betancur-Galvis et al [15], but more than found by Fernández-Luqueño et al [6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Fernández-Luqueño et al [6] reported that in soil of Texcoco with EC 30 dS m -1 or 80 dS m -1 , removal of Anthra was not affected by the application of wastewater sludge. However, Betancur-Galvis et al [15] found that the removal of Phen in wastewater sludge amended soil with EC 12 dS m -1 , and pH 10 was 54% compared to only 25% in the unamended soil after seven days and 71% and 29%, respectively, after 112 days. In the experiment reported here the wastewater sludge had less effect on the removal of Phen and Anthra than as reported by Betancur-Galvis et al [15], but more than found by Fernández-Luqueño et al [6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Betancur-Galvis et al [15] found that the removal of Phen in wastewater sludge amended soil with EC 12 dS m -1 , and pH 10 was 54% compared to only 25% in the unamended soil after seven days and 71% and 29%, respectively, after 112 days. In the experiment reported here the wastewater sludge had less effect on the removal of Phen and Anthra than as reported by Betancur-Galvis et al [15], but more than found by Fernández-Luqueño et al [6]. This would indicate that the application of the wastewater sludge from the same treatment plant did not always have the same effect on the removal of Anthra and Phen from soil.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In a previous experiment that used soil from Texcoco (pH 10.0 and electrolytic conductivity (EC) 12 dS m -1 ), the application of wastewater sludge to soil accelerated the removal of phenanthrene (PHEN) and anthracene (ANTHR) and nearly halved their final concentrations after 112 days [8]. However, soils with pH 9.3 and EC 7.3 dS m -1 for the application of wastewater sludge had no significant effect on the removal of ANTHR after 112 days [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%