2014
DOI: 10.3109/1040841x.2014.974501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bioremediation of chromium solutions and chromium containing wastewaters

Abstract: Cr(VI) represents a serious threat to human health, living resources and ecological system as it is persistent, carcinogenic and toxic, whereas, Cr(III), another stable oxidation state of Cr, is less toxic and can be readily precipitated out of solution. The conventional methods of Cr(VI) removal from wastewaters comprise of chemical reduction followed by chemical precipitation. However, these methods utilize large amounts of chemicals and generate toxic sludge. This necessitates the need for devising an eco-t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 231 publications
0
24
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The conventional processes are complex due to the different intensive sub-processes and use of large amounts of chemicals and generation of toxic sludges. [13,42,43] Carbothermal reduction of Cr(VI) was conducted by adding carbon at temperature ranging from 1000 to 1400 o C in a TGA apparatus with particle size limitation of the Cr(VI) contaminated soil sample [27]. To achieve a complete reduction 15% carbon was added to soil, however, evaluation of CO2 emission was ignored during the process.…”
Section: Comparison Of Conventional and Bioremediation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The conventional processes are complex due to the different intensive sub-processes and use of large amounts of chemicals and generation of toxic sludges. [13,42,43] Carbothermal reduction of Cr(VI) was conducted by adding carbon at temperature ranging from 1000 to 1400 o C in a TGA apparatus with particle size limitation of the Cr(VI) contaminated soil sample [27]. To achieve a complete reduction 15% carbon was added to soil, however, evaluation of CO2 emission was ignored during the process.…”
Section: Comparison Of Conventional and Bioremediation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has stimulated the interest in microorganisms that can use Cr(VI) as an electron acceptor. The biological detoxification involves different inner and outer cellular reactions such as direct reduction by chromium reducing bacteria, biosorption, and phytoremediation, and indirect reduction by application of different electron shuttles, bioremediation, and bioaccumulation [13,46]. The ascorbate with glutathione and cysteine produced during the cellular metabolism is responsible for more than 95% of Cr(VI) reduction [49,50].…”
Section: Comparison Of Conventional and Bioremediation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The pH, with its effects on the surface properties of the cells, including cell surface hydrophobicity, net surface electrostatic charge, and biofilm structure, may also heavily affect complex biological and electrochemical reactions at the biocathode. Variation in pH may also affect enzymatic activity, and produced Cr(III) precipitation or bio-adsorption [105]. In Huang et al [64,65], 50 mg/L initial Cr(VI) concentration inhibited the catalytic activity of electrochemical bacteria in the biocathode, whereas, at a 20 mg/L Cr(VI) concentration, chromium reduction efficiencies increased (+27.3%) and decreased (−21%) in acidic (pH = 5) and alkaline catholyte (pH = 8), with respect to neutral pH.…”
Section: Effects Of Ph and Cr(vi) Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 99%