2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2008.11.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bioreduction of hematite nanoparticles by the dissimilatory iron reducing bacterium Shewanella oneidensis MR-1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
88
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 209 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
12
88
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 2 shows that the differences in the surface-normalized reactivities within the various colloidal aggregate species are only minor and do not follow a size-dependent relationship. Even among monocrystalline nanoparticles of Ͻ100 nm, no clear size-reactivity relationship was discovered (5,47). Instead, in our experiments we observed a size dependency of the reduction rate when comparing colloidal, nanosized aggregates to bulk macroaggregates; the difference in the determined biotic reactivity might thus be credited to the suspended state and, therefore, the high spatial bioaccessibility of the colloidal iron oxide aggregate.…”
Section: Vol 76 2010 Nanosized Iron Oxide Colloids Enhance Iron Redcontrasting
confidence: 61%
“…Figure 2 shows that the differences in the surface-normalized reactivities within the various colloidal aggregate species are only minor and do not follow a size-dependent relationship. Even among monocrystalline nanoparticles of Ͻ100 nm, no clear size-reactivity relationship was discovered (5,47). Instead, in our experiments we observed a size dependency of the reduction rate when comparing colloidal, nanosized aggregates to bulk macroaggregates; the difference in the determined biotic reactivity might thus be credited to the suspended state and, therefore, the high spatial bioaccessibility of the colloidal iron oxide aggregate.…”
Section: Vol 76 2010 Nanosized Iron Oxide Colloids Enhance Iron Redcontrasting
confidence: 61%
“…Examination of canga solids by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) revealed smaller Fe(III)-rich particles than the other solids ( Figure 3A-E), which would also enhance Fe(III) bioreduction [23,25,41]. Iron ore contained large particles (many ≥ 10 μm) that were not observed in other solid phases ( Figure 3A-E), while particles in BIF were of similar sizes and morphologies to those in canga ( Figure 3A,B).…”
Section: Controls On Fe(iii) Bioreductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reference diffraction patterns of goethite, quartz, and hematite are shown for comparison and were generated using data from The American Mineralogist Crystal Structure Database [22]. [23][24][25], we chose a relatively simple first order rate formulation for the purpose of comparing rates of Fe(III) bioreduction among a variety of Fe(III) phases. Initial rates of Fe(III) bioreduction exhibited a similar trend to the observed extents of Fe(III) reduction, with canga-and BIF-Fe(III) undergoing reduction at the greatest initial rates, while iron ore-and HEM spec -Fe(III) underwent bioreduction at the lowest initial rates.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…doi:10.1016/j.gca.2010.09.008 Zachara, 1996;Fredrickson et al, 1998;Benner et al, 2002;Ona-Nguema et al, 2002;Zachara et al, 2002;Fredrickson et al, 2003;Glasauer et al, 2003;Hansel et al, 2003Hansel et al, , 2004Ona-Nguema et al, 2004;Behrends and Van Cappellen, 2007;Wilkins et al, 2007;Bose et al, 2009). However, pure Fe(III) (hydr)oxides are rarely found in natural soils and sediments and instead commonly contain several mol% substituted ions (Cornell and Schwertmann, 2003).…”
Section: +mentioning
confidence: 99%