Biopsychosocial Management of Female Sexual Dysfunction: A Pilot Study of Patient Perceptions From 2 Multi-Disciplinary Clinics

Abstract

BackgroundSexual dysfunction is often complex and biopsychosocial. Traditional sexual health care management involves individual providers not in a multi-disciplinary setting. A multi-disciplinary team may consist of a medical provider, pelvic floor physical therapist, and sex therapist.AimThe aim was to explore the patient perceptions of benefit from management of their sexual dysfunction by a biopsychosocial multi-disciplinary team.MethodsA survey was e-mailed to women patients seen by multi-disciplinary teams at 2 different settings: San Diego Sexual Medicine or Mayo Clinic Women's Health Clinic during a 27-month period. Data are reported using summary statistics for age and count for remaining survey responses. Cochran-Armitage tests for trend were used to compare pre- and post-comfort levels.OutcomesMain outcome measures included perceived benefit of being managed in a team-based model of care, level of benefit and satisfaction from each provider, and difference from pre-conceived level of comfort to actual comfort after each provider visit.Results89 of 270 e-mailed surveys were analyzed. Patient populations (mean age 47.6, range 23–77 years) were similar between sites. Overall, 82% of respondents reported moderate/great benefit from the team-based model; 72.1% reported management by all 3 providers valuable/extremely valuable; and 84.3% were somewhat/very satisfied with the model. Women endorsed specific ways in which they benefitted from the team-based model including: improved sexual function (58.1%), feeling validated (72.1%) and listened to (62.8%), that they better understood their health concerns (65.1%), that their partner better understood their health concerns (46.5%), and feeling normal (46.5%). There were no significant differences between the 2 clinics in terms of patient-perceived benefit, value, or satisfaction.ConclusionsThe team-based model of care for management of sexual dysfunction in women including a medical provider, physical therapist, and sex therapist is associated with patient-perceived benefit, satisfaction, and value.Rullo J, Faubion S, Hartzell R, et al. Biopsychosocial Management of Female Sexual Dysfunction: A Pilot Study of Patient Perceptions From 2 Multi-Disciplinary Clinics. Sex Med 2018;6:217–223.

Management of genitourinary syndrome of menopause in female cancer patients: a focus on vaginal hormonal therapy

“…Given the complex and multifactorial nature of sexual health concerns, support for a multidisciplinary treatment approach, including medical providers, sex therapists, and pelvic floor physical therapists, continues to grow. [82][83][84] Women are often hesitant to report sexual health concerns and specifically GSM to their healthcare providers because of embarrassment, shame, and/or a mistaken belief that treatment options do not exist. 85 Many suffer for years with sexual pain and resulting avoidance of intimacy and relational distress.…”

The International Society for the Study of Women's Sexual Health Process of Care for the Identification of Sexual Concerns and Problems in Women

“…However, many sexual health concerns have a biopsychosocial etiology and may require a multidisciplinary treatment team. 46 Sexual health concerns that are predominantly due to psychological, interpersonal, or sociocultural factors are best treated by a mental health provider. Sexual pain disorders likely need a sexual medicine specialist in conjunction with a pelvic floor physical therapist.…”

Sexual Dysfunction in Patients with Systemic Sclerosis

“…The management of impaired sexuality in women with systemic sclerosis was less studied and the further research is strongly needed. What is essential and beneficial for the patients is the team-based model of care for management of sexual dysfunction including a medical provider, physical therapist, occupational therapist, psychotherapist, and sex therapist [57].…”