2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.12.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biopsy first: Lessons learned from Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) 140503

Abstract: OBJECTIVE CALGB 140503 is an ongoing multi-center randomized trial assessing whether sub-lobar resection is equivalent to lobectomy for the treatment of stage IA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) ≤ 2 cm in diameter. The objective of this report is to determine the reasons precluding intra-operative randomization. METHODS From June 15, 2007 to March 22, 2013, 637 patients were preregistered to the trial. Three hundred eighty-nine were successfully randomized (61%) and 248 patients were not randomized (39%). … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(21 reference statements)
0
36
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A preliminary analysis demonstrated that 16% of all registered patients had benign pathology. In addition, nodal upstaging occurred in 6.4% of the patients; this rate was lower than the rates in other published studies, perhaps because of improved staging procedures and patient selection …”
Section: Surgery: Overviewcontrasting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A preliminary analysis demonstrated that 16% of all registered patients had benign pathology. In addition, nodal upstaging occurred in 6.4% of the patients; this rate was lower than the rates in other published studies, perhaps because of improved staging procedures and patient selection …”
Section: Surgery: Overviewcontrasting
confidence: 60%
“…Lobectomy has been the gold standard for the resection of early‐stage NSCLC since the Lung Cancer Study Group trial results were published in 1995 . Although there were no differences in perioperative morbidity or mortality between the groups, patients with limited resection (either wedge resection or segmentectomy) experienced a significantly higher incidence of disease recurrence, perhaps because of occult nodal metastases, which may be present in 4% to 20% of patients undergoing resection of clinical stage I lung cancer . Wedge resection is a nonanatomic resection in which interlobar and parenchymal (N1) lymph nodes are not typically obtained for pathologic analysis.…”
Section: Surgery: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Japan Clinical Oncology Group and West Japan Oncology Group trial, JCOG0802/WJOG4607L, randomizes patients with invasive adenocarcinomas smaller than two centimeters to segmentectomy or lobectomy (76). The Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology study, CALGB 140503, assigns patients with small (<2 cm) peripheral tumors to either sublobar resection (wedge resection or segmentectomy) or lobar resection via VATS or thoracotomy (77,78). A phase II trial, JCOG0804/WJOG4507L, compares wide wedge resections to segmentectomies in small adenocarcinomas (79).…”
Section: Extent Of Surgery: Effectiveness Of Lobar and Sublobar Resecmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both trials just completed enrollment and they are similar in design in that they randomized patients to either lobectomy or sub-lobar resection for peripheral cancer less than 2 cm in diameter (11). The Japanese trial (JCOG0802/ WJOG4607L) included 1,100 patients accrued from 71 institutions within 3 years (10).…”
Section: Implications Of Ongoing Randomized Clinical Trials (Rcts)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the role of parenchymal-sparing operations such as segmentectomy in the treatment of T1a lung carcinoma, is still of much debate, in part because of the retrospective nature of existing published studies (7)(8)(9). Two randomized control trials however, both of which have currently finished enrollment, will hopefully shed further light on this topic (10,11). Understanding the nuances of segmentectomy is essential to minimize patient morbidity and improve overall oncologic efficiency, and a crucial skill for today's thoracic surgeon.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%