2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2022.03.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biopsy-derived oral keratinocytes – A model to potentially test for oral mucosa radiation sensitivity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the basal stratum was analyzed, we found a positive immunostaining signal for cytokeratins AE5/AE3, CK5 and CK14, and a negative signal for other types of cytokeratins, with no differences between POM and OOM. Apart from AE1/AE3, which is an unspecific cocktail of cytokeratins, CK5 and CK14 are typically expressed by proliferating epithelia, and have been used as a marker of keratinocytes (Bucchieri et al, 2012; Thomsen et al, 2022). Their expression at the basal stratum, along with the absence of other cytokeratins that are associated to keratinocyte differentiation, confirms the stemness character of cells allocated at this stratum, and suggests that no differences between POM and OOM may exist at this level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the basal stratum was analyzed, we found a positive immunostaining signal for cytokeratins AE5/AE3, CK5 and CK14, and a negative signal for other types of cytokeratins, with no differences between POM and OOM. Apart from AE1/AE3, which is an unspecific cocktail of cytokeratins, CK5 and CK14 are typically expressed by proliferating epithelia, and have been used as a marker of keratinocytes (Bucchieri et al, 2012; Thomsen et al, 2022). Their expression at the basal stratum, along with the absence of other cytokeratins that are associated to keratinocyte differentiation, confirms the stemness character of cells allocated at this stratum, and suggests that no differences between POM and OOM may exist at this level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To generate primary GBM cell lines, the patient-derived tumor tissue was cut into small pieces, transferred into a 6-well plate, and covered with medium-filled agarose cups (provided by Dr. Andreas Thomsen, University of Freiburg [ 28 ]). After 1–2 weeks of incubation, the cells were transferred to culture flasks and cultivated in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% FCS and 1% penicillin/streptomycin at 37 °C, 5% CO 2 , and 95% humidity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to establish a reliable 3D model of patient-derived GBM cells for analysis of long-term tumor growth and radiation response, we used a conical agarose 3D microwell system [ 28 , 29 ]. The microwells are made of agarose, which allows the diffusion of molecules, and the non-adhesive characteristic prevents cells from attaching to the surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…OM not only has a negative impact on quality of life (for example extreme pain and difficulty in swallowing) but is also a detrimental dose-limiting factor for RT and a reason to interrupt or even terminate radiation therapy ( 11 ). Several intrinsic and extrinsic factors, including individual radiosensitivity, determine the risk for the development of oral mucositis ( 12 , 13 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides cell death, γ-IR (0.1 Gy) was also shown to induce differentiation in Ca 2+ -activated keratinocytes, validated by increased mRNA and protein levels of involucrin, a marker for keratinocyte differentiation ( 25 ). Biopsy-derived oral keratinocytes were recently proposed as a model to investigate individual radiosensitivity, where irradiated keratinocytes showed a dose-dependent (2 Gy-8 Gy) decrease in their spread as well as their colony forming efficiency ( 13 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%