The Biopolitics of Development 2013
DOI: 10.1007/978-81-322-1596-7_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biopolitics and Urban Governmentality in Mumbai

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Urban gating accelerated in the 2000s, producing a micro-economy of spatial control through neighborhood welfare associations, whose punitive stance vis-à-vis the “encroachments” of the poor led to aggressive slum removal campaigns and urban beautification drives (Baviskar, 2003; Ghertner, 2015). The growing use of cooperative group housing societies—residential complexes organized on the basis of “community” (read: caste and religion) (Jha et al, 2013)—and the explosion of integrated, luxury townships in India hence need to be seen as more than Indian expressions of a broader pattern of neoliberal urbanism. They are as much responses to a crisis of Hindu domesticity associated with the decline of the joint family, the rise of communal and gender violence (Hansen, 1999), and the (caste) democratization of the public sphere.…”
Section: The Securitized Body In the Fortressed Citymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Urban gating accelerated in the 2000s, producing a micro-economy of spatial control through neighborhood welfare associations, whose punitive stance vis-à-vis the “encroachments” of the poor led to aggressive slum removal campaigns and urban beautification drives (Baviskar, 2003; Ghertner, 2015). The growing use of cooperative group housing societies—residential complexes organized on the basis of “community” (read: caste and religion) (Jha et al, 2013)—and the explosion of integrated, luxury townships in India hence need to be seen as more than Indian expressions of a broader pattern of neoliberal urbanism. They are as much responses to a crisis of Hindu domesticity associated with the decline of the joint family, the rise of communal and gender violence (Hansen, 1999), and the (caste) democratization of the public sphere.…”
Section: The Securitized Body In the Fortressed Citymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In global South cities, biopolitical strategies influence efforts to improve the vitality of living among the urban poor. These strategies are deployed as development programs (Di Muzio 2008), as projects ensuring security (Zeiderman 2013), or as improvements of benefits and services (Jha et al 2013). But underlying these strategies are subtle politics of biopower that quietly exclude certain populations and occlude callous consequences, “rather than display itself in its murderous splendor” (Foucault 1978:144).…”
Section: Urbanisation and (Bio)necropoliticsmentioning
confidence: 99%