2012
DOI: 10.4324/9780203882061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biopolitics and the 'Obesity Epidemic'

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
206
0
6

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(214 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
206
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…As argued by Crawford (1998, p. 84), healthism engenders a 'blaming the victim' discourse, which intimates that '[if] individuals take appropriate actions, if they … adopt life-styles which avoid unhealthy behaviour, may prevent most diseases'. Of particular significance to the present study, healthism pays little to no attention to the impact of social structure, life circumstances and life contingencies, which shape the dispositions and offer opportunities for engaging in health practices (Crawford, 1998;Wright and Harwood, 2009).…”
Section: Women Lifestyle and Obesity A Critical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As argued by Crawford (1998, p. 84), healthism engenders a 'blaming the victim' discourse, which intimates that '[if] individuals take appropriate actions, if they … adopt life-styles which avoid unhealthy behaviour, may prevent most diseases'. Of particular significance to the present study, healthism pays little to no attention to the impact of social structure, life circumstances and life contingencies, which shape the dispositions and offer opportunities for engaging in health practices (Crawford, 1998;Wright and Harwood, 2009).…”
Section: Women Lifestyle and Obesity A Critical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The moral panic surrounding childhood obesity demonstrates with particular clarity how multifactorial and systemic problems may be reduced to biological arguments for inferiority, as the authoritative claims of 'regulatory science' (Jasonoff 1995;Winnicoff 2013) pinpoint various degenerative bodily processes. In this era of complex, layered governance (Rose 1999; Winnicoff 2013), regulatory science formulates 'evidence' into politically useful forms, disseminated by courts and state actors such as child protection officers and social workers; it favours a subtly authoritarian (Brown and Baker 2012;Gard and Wright 2005;Wright 2008) consensus on issues of social concern, which percolates into 'common sense' through media exposure. The debate on infant feeding (Wolf 2007;Hausman 2003) references similar fears of perinatal malnutrition and 'lazy' mothering styles, with mass failure to breastfeed supposedly creating a population with lowered intelligence and disease resistance, and higher body weight over life.…”
Section: Risk Genetics and National (Un)fitnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as social and economic conditions worsen the burden of treating chronic disease on national health expenditure increases exponentially [49]. Unable to afford healthy lifestyle options Māori are frequently subjected to negative stereotypes and deficit explanations that unfairly direct fault at Māori for being obese, unhealthy, and sedentary along with accusations that they make poor lifestyle choices [48,50]. Accusations such as these ignore genetic, contemporary socio-cultural and environmental factors that contribute to their unhealthy lifestyle.…”
Section: Cultures Apartmentioning
confidence: 99%