2016
DOI: 10.1159/000446614
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biophysically Motivated Regulatory Network Inference: Progress and Prospects

Abstract: Thanks to the confluence of genomic technology and computational developments, the possibility of network inference methods that automatically learn large comprehensive models of cellular regulation is closer than ever. This perspective focuses on enumerating the elements of computational strategies that, when coupled to appropriate experimental designs, can lead to accurate large-scale models of chromatin state and transcriptional regulatory structure and dynamics. We highlight 4 research questions that requi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 177 publications
(142 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, agreement between the inferred parameters and ground truth (or, for experimental data, FSP estimates) was not guaranteed, especially for k ini and k off . As in Fig 2, these gaps in performance appear to correspond to non-uniqueness in mapping from the parameter domain to the observable domain [29], and inability of the genetic algorithm to report degenerate results. We suggest that this degeneracy is best identified by running the search algorithm multiple times and examining the resulting distribution of point estimates from the centers of the search populations.…”
Section: Parameter Estimationmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…However, agreement between the inferred parameters and ground truth (or, for experimental data, FSP estimates) was not guaranteed, especially for k ini and k off . As in Fig 2, these gaps in performance appear to correspond to non-uniqueness in mapping from the parameter domain to the observable domain [29], and inability of the genetic algorithm to report degenerate results. We suggest that this degeneracy is best identified by running the search algorithm multiple times and examining the resulting distribution of point estimates from the centers of the search populations.…”
Section: Parameter Estimationmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Single‐cell transcriptomics data represent a rich source of information to infer interactions which occur between genes and transcription factors. However, new studies are highlighting the need to not only focus on a single‐cell's transcripts, but also the methylation state of the DNA, the chromatin state and other epigenomic data that might enrich our knowledge of the gene regulation dynamics .…”
Section: Advanced Computational Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gene network inference is a deeply studied problem in computational biology (Friedman, 2004;Albert, 2007;Bansal et al, 2007;Penfold and Wild, 2011;Emmert-Streib et al, 2012;Marbach et al, 2012;Äijö and Bonneau, 2016;Kiani et al, 2016). Among the many successful methods that have been devised, Bayesian networks are a powerful approach for modelling causal relationships and incorporating prior knowledge (Friedman et al, 2000;Friedman, 2004;Werhli and Husmeier, 2007;Mukherjee and Speed, 2008;Koller and Friedman, 2009;Pearl, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%