2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.12.129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biophysical characterization of the EF-hand and SAM domain containing Ca2+ sensory region of STIM1 and STIM2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
122
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(129 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
4
122
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A lower Ca 2ϩ -activation threshold of STIM2 as compared with STIM1 has been suggested (2), although N-terminal Ca 2ϩ -binding affinity seems to be similar for STIM1 and STIM2 (27)(28)(29). In STIM2 knock-out mice, and also in several cell types in which STIM2 has been silenced, SOCE amplitude is only slightly reduced.…”
Section: Stim1 and Stim2 Are Endoplasmic Reticulum (Er)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A lower Ca 2ϩ -activation threshold of STIM2 as compared with STIM1 has been suggested (2), although N-terminal Ca 2ϩ -binding affinity seems to be similar for STIM1 and STIM2 (27)(28)(29). In STIM2 knock-out mice, and also in several cell types in which STIM2 has been silenced, SOCE amplitude is only slightly reduced.…”
Section: Stim1 and Stim2 Are Endoplasmic Reticulum (Er)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The propensity of STIM1 to aggregate when its EF-hands are not bound by Ca 2+ can be demonstrated using just a short recombinant N-terminal fragment of STIM1, containing only the EF-hands and the adjacent SAM (sterile α-motif) domain [56,57]. Once formed, the STIM1 clusters preferentially localize to sites of ER-plasma membrane apposition and colocalize partially with clusters of ORAI1 [55,58, [61,62].…”
Section: Gating Of Crac Channels By Local Aggregation Of Stim and Oraimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These rearrangements expose the C-terminal polybasic domain, which interacts with phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate in the plasma membrane (PM) and drives STIM accumulation at ER-PM junctions (Wu et al, 2006;Liou et al, 2007;Ercan et al, 2009;Park et al, 2009). Although STIM1 and STIM2 respond similarly to store depletion, STIM2 differs from STIM1 in being partially localized at ER-PM junctions even in store-replete cells, likely as a result of its lower affinity for ER Ca 2+ relative to STIM1 (Brandman et al, 2007;Zheng et al, 2008). At ER-PM junctions STIM proteins directly bind to and trap Orai channels (Park et al, 2009;Wu et al, 2014) through their CRAC activation domains (CADs; also known as SOAR [STIM1 Orai1 activation region] or CCb9; Kawasaki et al, 2009;Park et al, 2009;Yuan et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%