2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.proenv.2010.10.164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomonitoring and Bioindicators Used for River Ecosystems: Definitions, Approaches and Trends

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
97
0
10

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 235 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 133 publications
0
97
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Tiny, Quick, and Beautiful Algae and cyanobacteria are valuable indicators of environmental conditions in running and standing water bodies. As primary producers, periphyton acts as an important foundation of food webs in river ecosystems (Li et al 2010). Because the assemblages usually attach to substrate, their growing and prospering can respond directly and sensitively to many kinds of physical, chemical, and biological variation occurring in the river reach, including temperature, nutrient levels, current regimes and grazing, etc.…”
Section: Indicator Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tiny, Quick, and Beautiful Algae and cyanobacteria are valuable indicators of environmental conditions in running and standing water bodies. As primary producers, periphyton acts as an important foundation of food webs in river ecosystems (Li et al 2010). Because the assemblages usually attach to substrate, their growing and prospering can respond directly and sensitively to many kinds of physical, chemical, and biological variation occurring in the river reach, including temperature, nutrient levels, current regimes and grazing, etc.…”
Section: Indicator Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such impacts result into failure of rivers in providing ecosystem services like recreation, biodiversity, scenic beauty, fisheries, irrigation . Therefore, monitoring and assessment of impacts of stressors is necessary (Li et al, 2010) for proper management of these water bodies. In routine monitoring practices, a range of physical, chemical and biological components are assessed and monitored (Meybeck et al, 1996) as these components are known to provide comprehensive information on the impacts of stressors on water quality making such assessments as holistic approaches (Balian et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In routine monitoring practices, a range of physical, chemical and biological components are assessed and monitored (Meybeck et al, 1996) as these components are known to provide comprehensive information on the impacts of stressors on water quality making such assessments as holistic approaches (Balian et al, 2008). Monitoring and assessment methods using biological indicators are often considered advantageous over chemical-based approaches since the latter provides only the "snapshots" whereas the biota provides more information on the ecological status of the ecosystems (Li et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of living organisms for monitoring water quality originated in Europe and it is widely used in developed and developing countries (Cairns and Pratt, 1993;Metcalfe-Smith, 1994;Bonada et al, 2006). A spectrum of biological communities including plankton, periphyton, microphytobenthos, macrozoobenthos, aquatic macrophytes and fishes have been used in the assessment of river water quality (De Pauw et al, 1992;Bae et al, 2005;Li et al, 2010). The systematic development and testing of rapid bioassessment tools on river basins using benthic macroinvertebrates in developing countries like India (Sivaramakrishnan et al, 1996;Sivaramakrishnan, 2000;Subramananian et al, 2005;Dinakaran and Anbalagan, 2007a;2007b;Sharma et al, 2008;Muralidharan et al, 2010), Thailand (Boomsoong et al, 2008;, Malaysia (Ahmad et al, 2002) and Brazil (Callisto et al, 1998;Buss, 2001;Buss et al, 2002;Silveira et al, 2005;Buss and Salles, 2007) are quite recent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%