Biomolecular interactions control the shape of stains from drying droplets of complex fluids

Abstract

When a sessile droplet of a complex fluid dries, a stain forms on the solid surface. The structure and pattern of the stain can be used to detect the presence of a specific chemical compound in the sessile droplet. In the present work, we investigate what parameters of the stain or its formation can be used to characterize the specific interaction between an aqueous dispersion of beads and its receptor immobilized on the surface. We use the biotin-streptavidin system as an experimental model. Clear dissimilarities were observed in the drying sequences on streptavidin-coated substrates of droplets of aqueous solutions containing biotin-coated or streptavidin-coated beads. Fluorescent beads are used in order to visualize the fluid flow field. We show differences in the distribution of the particles on the surface depending on biomolecular interactions between beads and the solid surface. A mechanistic model is proposed to explain the different patterns obtained during drying. The model describes that the beads are left behind the receding wetting line rather than pulled towards the drop center if the biological binding force is comparable to the surface tension of the receding wetting line. Other forces such as the viscous drag, van der Waals forces, and solid-solid friction forces are found negligible. Simple microfluidics experiments are performed to further illustrate the difference in behavior where is adhesion or friction are present between the bead and substrate due to the biological force. The results of the model are in agreement with the experimental observations which provide insight and design capabilities. A better understanding of the effects of the droplet-surface interaction on the drying mechanism is a crucial first step before the identification of drying patterns can be promisingly applied to areas such as immunology and biomarker detection. Comments NOTICE: this is the author's version of a work that was accepted for publication in Chemical Engineering Science. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Chemical Engineering Science, [137, (2015)

Evaporative deposition of polystyrene microparticles on PDMS surface

“…Hurth et al . 23 conducted evaporation of sessile droplet containing streptavidin- or biotin-coated fluorescent polystyrene (PS) particles and found that both the biological binding force and the capillary force play significant roles in particle deposition and that the viscous drag, van der Waals forces, and solid-solid friction forces are negligible. Recently, using particle tracking velocimetry technique, Yu et al .…”

Recent Developments on Colloidal Deposits Obtained by Evaporation of Sessile Droplets on a Solid Surface

“…For instance, this knowledge base will help to explain deposit obtained from the drying of blood droplets which could be useful in forensics [45], biomarkers [46] and fingerprint residues in blood pattern analysis [6]. In biology, the bio-molecular interaction between the particles and substrate is important to understand the formation of bio-assays [47]. In this review, we tried to put recent studies that considered the effect of substrate heating, particle size and substrate wettability, however, the combined or coupled effect of each of these parameters over another for wider range is still lacking in the literature.…”

Colloidal Deposits via Capillary Bridge Evaporation and Particle Sorting Thereof

“…In addition, other effects which were found significant in controlling the shape of the deposit are the particle shape, 6 surfactant concentration, 15 substrate elasticity, 16 ambient pressure, 17 particle size, 18 and bio-molecular interaction between the particles and the substrate. 19 In the context of evaporation on a hydrophobic surface, the direction of the characteristic evaporation-driven flow velocity inside the droplet on a superhydrophobic surface is opposite to that on a hydrophilic surface. The colloidal particles move upward due to a larger mass loss at the apex of the droplet as compared to near the contact line.…”