2016
DOI: 10.18637/jss.v073.i05
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biometrics and Psychometrics: Origins, Commonalities and Differences

Abstract: Starting with the common origins of biometrics and psychometrics at the beginning of the twentieth century, the paper compares and contrasts subsequent developments, informed by the author's 35 years at Rothamsted Experimental Station followed by a period with the data theory group in Leiden and thereafter. Although the methods used by biometricians and psychometricians have much in common, there are important differences arising from the different fields of study. Similar differences arise wherever data are g… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…He is one of the key figures in early scaling developments and has a 60-year experience in the field of biometrics, (he started at Rothamsted in 1956 under Frank Yates). In his contribution (Gower 2016) he elaborates on the interaction between biometrics and psychometrics in relation to linear algebra and optimization, and puts Jan's methodological efforts into this context.…”
Section: R> Dtmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He is one of the key figures in early scaling developments and has a 60-year experience in the field of biometrics, (he started at Rothamsted in 1956 under Frank Yates). In his contribution (Gower 2016) he elaborates on the interaction between biometrics and psychometrics in relation to linear algebra and optimization, and puts Jan's methodological efforts into this context.…”
Section: R> Dtmmentioning
confidence: 99%