1980
DOI: 10.1007/bf01608138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomethylation of inorganic arsenic by the rat and some laboratory animals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike humans, the marmoset and guinea pig do not methylate arsenic, so they are poor models for arsenic toxicity studies (Healy et al,1999; Vahter,2002). Rats do have metabolic, distribution, and excretion functions similar to those in humans (Odanaka et al,1980; Vahter,1981) and have been valuable models for investigating the effects of arsenic (Davis et al,2000; Lin et al,2002), plus arsenic–selenium interactions (Spallholz et al,2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike humans, the marmoset and guinea pig do not methylate arsenic, so they are poor models for arsenic toxicity studies (Healy et al,1999; Vahter,2002). Rats do have metabolic, distribution, and excretion functions similar to those in humans (Odanaka et al,1980; Vahter,1981) and have been valuable models for investigating the effects of arsenic (Davis et al,2000; Lin et al,2002), plus arsenic–selenium interactions (Spallholz et al,2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been established that the rat is different from other mammals in that it accumulates arsenic in the blood. 16,17 In our experience, rats accumulate arsenic in the blood up to 30-60 times more than guinea pigs when given the same amount of sodium arsenate and sodium arsenite, respectively. Therefore, rats could be used as sensitive indicators for body absorption of arsenicals.…”
Section: Bioavailability Studymentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Although a similar percentage is absorbed by the rat, significantly lower amounts are excreted (Stevens et al, 1977;Vahter et al, 1984). This is due to the unique binding of DMA to rat hemoglobin, which results in retention of the compound (Stevens et al, 1977;Odanaka et al, 1980). The absorption of DMA by the hamster after oral administration is lower than for other species 96 M. F. HUGHES AND E. M. KENYON (Yamauchi & Yamamura, 1984).…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%