Biomedical Science Ph.D. Career Interest Patterns by Race/Ethnicity and Gender

Abstract

Increasing biomedical workforce diversity remains a persistent challenge. Recent reports have shown that biomedical sciences (BMS) graduate students become less interested in faculty careers as training progresses; however, it is unclear whether or how the career preferences of women and underrepresented minority (URM) scientists change in manners distinct from their better-represented peers. We report results from a survey of 1500 recent American BMS Ph.D. graduates (including 276 URMs) that examined career preferences over the course of their graduate training experiences. On average, scientists from all social backgrounds showed significantly decreased interest in faculty careers at research universities, and significantly increased interest in non-research careers at Ph.D. completion relative to entry. However, group differences emerged in overall levels of interest (at Ph.D. entry and completion), and the magnitude of change in interest in these careers. Multiple logistic regression showed that when controlling for career pathway interest at Ph.D. entry, first-author publication rate, faculty support, research self-efficacy, and graduate training experiences, differences in career pathway interest between social identity groups persisted. All groups were less likely than men from well-represented (WR) racial/ethnic backgrounds to report high interest in faculty careers at research-intensive universities (URM men: OR 0.60, 95% CI: 0.36–0.98, p = 0.04; WR women: OR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.47–0.89, p = 0.008; URM women: OR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.30–0.71, p<0.001), and URM women were more likely than all other groups to report high interest in non-research careers (OR: 1.93, 95% CI: 1.28–2.90, p = 0.002). The persistence of disparities in the career interests of Ph.D. recipients suggests that a supply-side (or “pipeline”) framing of biomedical workforce diversity challenges may limit the effectiveness of efforts to attract and retain the best and most diverse workforce. We propose incorporation of an ecological perspective of career development when considering strategies to enhance the biomedical workforce and professoriate through diversity.

The Status of Women in STEM in Higher Education: A Review of the Literature 2007–2017

“…Campbell (2011, 310) proposes a new model "Sequence of Life Events Leading to Career Choices," providing a linear progression which maps out a career path from grade school through career. The leaky pipeline is a metaphor for the greater likelihood for women to leave STEM fields at every point, from recruitment to attrition after graduation (Goulden, Mason, and Frasch 2011), in the private sector (Harris 2015) or as faculty members (Chesler et al 2010;Gibbs et al 2014); because of a significant amount of barriers. These barriers are discussed further later in this paper.…”

Toward a sustainable biomedical research enterprise: Finding consensus and implementing recommendations

“…Increasing minority participation in research must go beyond enhancing kindergarten-to-twelfth grade (K-12) science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education programs for underrepresented minority students (31,32). The scientific community must also move quickly to identify and reform structural inequities such as unconscious bias in hiring and peer review and institutional cultures that select against women and underrepresented minorities (33)(34)(35)(36).…”

How Women in Biomedical PhD Programs Manage Gender Consciousness as They Persist Toward Academic Research Careers

“…2 Recent research shows that women as well as underrepresented racial and ethnic minority (URM) men are more likely to lose interest in faculty careers early in graduate school than White and Asian men. 3 However, a proportion of women do maintain high interest in academic research careers during PhD training, and they are the most likely candidates for faculty positions. Understanding women’s experiences with gender issues early in graduate training may help biomedical programs increase their support for women pursuing academic careers.…”