2019
DOI: 10.1561/2000000101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomedical Image Reconstruction: From the Foundations to Deep Neural Networks

Abstract: RKHS reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces SGD stochastic gradient descent SIM structured-illumination microscopy SNR signal-to-noise ratio SPECT single-photon emission computed tomography SSIM structural similarity index TCIA The Cancer Imaging Archive TV total variation

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
(126 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, within the context of an end-to-end learned reconstruction mapping, a prior is imposed that is implicitly specified by the distribution of training data and network topology. A comprehensive survey of the current state of deep learning-based methods in tomographic image reconstruction can be found in recent reviews, [9], [29], [30].…”
Section: Regularization In Tomographic Image Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, within the context of an end-to-end learned reconstruction mapping, a prior is imposed that is implicitly specified by the distribution of training data and network topology. A comprehensive survey of the current state of deep learning-based methods in tomographic image reconstruction can be found in recent reviews, [9], [29], [30].…”
Section: Regularization In Tomographic Image Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To solve x, a general approach that covers many applications in image and signal processing [47]- [50], [53]- [55] involves minimizing a convex optimization problem of the form minimize…”
Section: B Image Reconstruction Using Mathematical Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equation ( 9) can be solved by several techniques, including the alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) [52], [55], and accelerated proximal gradient (APG) [27], [47]- [50], [53]- [55]. Mathematical details of these minimization algorithms, as used in our approach, are provided in Appendix A.…”
Section: B Image Reconstruction Using Mathematical Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the fully connected layer, used to back project the sensor data in the image domain, non-linearly increases the memory requirements of the neural network, thereby limiting the maximum number of additional convolution layers. This layer is deemed compulsory for an inverse scattering problem where direct analytical reconstruction is not well defined, unlike in magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography where a well-defined inversion exists using Fourier transform or Radon transform [36].…”
Section: B Network Depth Trade-off: Complexity Versus Performancementioning
confidence: 99%