2022
DOI: 10.1080/02713683.2022.2041042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomechanics in Keratoconus Diagnosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(1) How to perform a fast, non-invasive, reliable, and high-resolution corneal biomechanical examination? There is a growing appreciation for the need to identify regional/ spatial variations in corneal mechanical characteristics for early-stage keratoconus diagnosis [117] , [118] , [119] when focal degenerations appear prior to clinical symptom caused by gross corneal deformations [166] . Because both ORA and Corvis ST measure tissue responses to global deformation forces, it is not possible to assess regional differences in tissue properties with these devices [163] , [164] , [165] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(1) How to perform a fast, non-invasive, reliable, and high-resolution corneal biomechanical examination? There is a growing appreciation for the need to identify regional/ spatial variations in corneal mechanical characteristics for early-stage keratoconus diagnosis [117] , [118] , [119] when focal degenerations appear prior to clinical symptom caused by gross corneal deformations [166] . Because both ORA and Corvis ST measure tissue responses to global deformation forces, it is not possible to assess regional differences in tissue properties with these devices [163] , [164] , [165] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early stages of subclinical asymptomatic keratoconus and form-fruste (non-progressing) keratoconus [118] , which may not be easily detectable by common clinical examination methods is regarded as a significant risk factor for the development of ectasia following laser refractive surgery [117] . Comprehensive evaluations that integrate corneal morphological and biomechanical measurements are required to detect keratoconus, particularly in its early or subclinical stages, and are advantageous for providing timely intervention [119] .…”
Section: Corneal Biomechanics Associated With Disease and Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA) and Corvis ST (CVS) are the only two clinical devices that facilitate in vivo biomechanical evaluations of the cornea and numerous studies have demonstrated enhanced diagnostic efficacy with biomechanical indices provided by these devices. The ORA applies an air puff to the anterior cornea, then records and measures the pressures at the two corneal applanation times [ 8 ]. CH (corneal hysteresis) and CRF (corneal resistance factor) are two important parameters measured by ORA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Performing refractive surgeries on keratoconus suspect eyes could lead to postoperative iatrogenic progressive ectatic disorder of the cornea (5). Due to the alteration of corneal biomechanical and viscoelastic properties in keratoconus pathophysiology (6), it has been proposed that corneal biomechanical parameters could detect subclinical keratoconus patients before the appearance of signi cant changes in the corneal topography and tomography (2,7).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%