Volume 3: Biomedical and Biotechnology Engineering 2015
DOI: 10.1115/imece2015-53525
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomechanics Aspects for Silastic Implant Arthroplasty Simulation of the First Metatarsophalangeal Joint

Abstract: This work focuses on the biomechanical simulation of surgery for total replacement of the first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) allowed us to identify and analyze several key aspects for finite element simulation of hallux rigidus pathology. Predicting the optimal response of a finite element model (FEM) depends on proper characterization. At this part of the work, those conditions that have a direct or indirect influence on the model that can change its behavior should be considered. For this … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Swanson implants are one of most silicone implants frequently used for joint reconstruction; specifically, for the metacarpophalangeal and metatarsophalangeal joints. 1,6,7,1219 Some other implants as Tornier have been created with an axial offset hinge design, which reduces stress on the prosthesis and improves biomechanical function, a characteristic that is not considered in Swanson implants. Moreover, joint flexion for Swanson implant has been measured after implantation finding a mean active and passive arc of motions of 36.80° (SD 19.13) and 46.82° (SD 17.19), respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Swanson implants are one of most silicone implants frequently used for joint reconstruction; specifically, for the metacarpophalangeal and metatarsophalangeal joints. 1,6,7,1219 Some other implants as Tornier have been created with an axial offset hinge design, which reduces stress on the prosthesis and improves biomechanical function, a characteristic that is not considered in Swanson implants. Moreover, joint flexion for Swanson implant has been measured after implantation finding a mean active and passive arc of motions of 36.80° (SD 19.13) and 46.82° (SD 17.19), respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%