2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0966-6362(02)00068-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomechanics and muscle coordination of human walking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
114
0
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 485 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 109 publications
1
114
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Several reference charts for muscle activity during gait have been published [1,[25][26][27][28][29][30]. In these the starting and stopping times of SEMG for lower extremity were variable and did not always agree.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several reference charts for muscle activity during gait have been published [1,[25][26][27][28][29][30]. In these the starting and stopping times of SEMG for lower extremity were variable and did not always agree.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,33,43,52 Because these simulations often combine human movement data measured in the laboratory with mathematical models of the musculoskeletal system, accurate estimations of biomechanical outputs such as intersegmental joint loads, muscle activation/coordination, and muscle force are possible. 18 The experimental methods used to create anatomic detail in musculoskeletal models have improved over the past decade through direct measurement of sarcomere length 26 and increased cadaveric sample sizes, 48 which has led to enhanced accuracy of simulations specific to individual patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relationships between gait kinematics and EMG patterns have previously been estimated by muscle-based simulations of dynamic walking (Zajac et al. 2002, 2003). Moving further, a better comprehension of the relationships which exist between the neuro-musculo-skeletal system would significantly advance the understanding of locomotor control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%