2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2020.05.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomechanical quantification of deadbug bridging performance in competitive alpine skiers: Reliability, reference values, and associations with skiing performance and back overuse complaints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The data analysis of the reliability experiment was carried out in accordance to the guidelines of Hopkins, 27 and analogous to previous reliability evaluations in which the procedure was described in detail. 28 It was taken into account for the habituation effect occurring in performance testing by using the open access spreadsheets from Hopkins, 29 and the intraclass correlation coefficient ICC(3,1) as well as the withinsubject error, also referred to as standardized typical error, were calculated. To obtain these values, the DJ landing tasks were carried out five times within one day by each participant and subsequently evaluated for MKD GRF QH GRF .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data analysis of the reliability experiment was carried out in accordance to the guidelines of Hopkins, 27 and analogous to previous reliability evaluations in which the procedure was described in detail. 28 It was taken into account for the habituation effect occurring in performance testing by using the open access spreadsheets from Hopkins, 29 and the intraclass correlation coefficient ICC(3,1) as well as the withinsubject error, also referred to as standardized typical error, were calculated. To obtain these values, the DJ landing tasks were carried out five times within one day by each participant and subsequently evaluated for MKD GRF QH GRF .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physical aspects are indeed known to be a key driver for injury risk in alpine ski racing. [23][24][25][26][27][28][29] Moreover, also in many sports other than alpine ski racing, the benefits of physical fitness-related injury prevention programmes have been demonstrated. [30][31][32] Concerning the 'ski, plate, binding, boot' category, several stakeholders suggested a less aggressive setup as one of the most promising approaches.…”
Section: Potential Change Of Perception Over the Last Decadementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given these sport-specific demands, a biomechanical quantification of skiers’ stabilization performance during deadbug bridging (DBB) exercises, i.e., the assessment of the relative displacement of one of the anterior spina iliac superior markers with respect to the contralateral marker in the transverse plane (see Figure 1 , Methods section), can be considered indicative of their global antirotation and rear-chain stabilization capacity. Indeed, a previous study found that biomechanically quantified DBB stabilization performance was related to both skiing performance and lower back overuse complaints in skiers of the under 16 years (U16) category [ 13 ]. Another study that examined the effects of an injury prevention program targeted to the specific injury patterns of youth skiers, which included DBB exercises, revealed a significantly lower prevalence of knee trauma and back overuse complaints [ 14 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While a biomechanical quantification of DBB performance and DBB exercises as preventative countermeasures have been thoroughly explored for skiers of the U16 category and the elite level in previous studies [ 13 , 14 ], to date, very little is known about the corresponding stabilization abilities in younger skiers, i.e., 6- to 15-year-old skiers. First, it is not a priori clear whether the coordinatively challenging motion task of DBB could be widely implemented for screening and training purposes in the youngest athletes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%