2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.01.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomechanical properties of lumbar endplates and their correlation with MRI findings of lumbar degeneration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, an animal model confirmed that chronic compression led to significantly increased vertebral bone marrow oedema in mice [6]. In addition, a biomechanical testing on 27 human cadaveric lumbar spines found that in the presence of MC (or degenerative disc) the strength and stiffness of the bony endplate decreased greatly, by up to 46% [27]. Therefore, it should be evident that biomechanical stress leads to MC in the case of disc herniation, considering that loss of nucleus material (by herniation or more violently by surgery) reduces intradiscal pressure [28] and subsequently alters the pressure load distribution over the disc [29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Furthermore, an animal model confirmed that chronic compression led to significantly increased vertebral bone marrow oedema in mice [6]. In addition, a biomechanical testing on 27 human cadaveric lumbar spines found that in the presence of MC (or degenerative disc) the strength and stiffness of the bony endplate decreased greatly, by up to 46% [27]. Therefore, it should be evident that biomechanical stress leads to MC in the case of disc herniation, considering that loss of nucleus material (by herniation or more violently by surgery) reduces intradiscal pressure [28] and subsequently alters the pressure load distribution over the disc [29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Peripheral regions have increased endplate thickness and bone density, as compared to the center of the endplate [34,35]. A study by Liu et al [36] found that the strength and stiffness was greater by 17% in the outer regions, as compared to the inner regions of the lumbar endplate. Although the anterior rim can provide reduction forces, care must be taken and the whole process should be completed under fluoroscopy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study [16] enrolled 2449 volunteers to explore the possible factors associated with MC, and the results confirmed that disc displacement and a higher disc degeneration score were associated with MC at the upper lumbar levels (L1/L2-L3/L4) (p<.01), while MC at the lowest 2 lumbar levels (L4/L5-L5/S1) were associated with the presence of Schmorl nodes, older patient age, disc degeneration or displacement, and historical lumbar injury. Research showed that cartilage and osseous endplate play an important role in biomechanics of the spine; the volume and shape of the disc is affected as the load on the spine increases, resulting in bending deformation of cartilage, the osseous endplate, and trabecular bone under the endplate [17][18][19][20]. MC may happen with the occurrence of these irreversible deformable injuries and microfracture of the cartilage, osseous endplate, and trabecular bone under the endplate [21][22][23][24][25].…”
Section: E919667-4mentioning
confidence: 99%