Biomechanical function of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus: a human cadaveric study

Watanabe, Yasuhiko; Scyoc, Andrew Van; Tsuda, Eiichi; Debski, Richard E.; Woo, Savio L‐Y.

doi:10.1007/s00776-004-0781-8

Cited by 31 publications

(23 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Previous studies have reported that the posterior horn of the meniscus plays more important roles than the other parts. 22,34 Considering the reports, it can be clinically favorable that the relative value of PCMD was maintained in this study. In this study, when the outside of the tibial cartilage margin was positive, only the posterior horn showed a negative value.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 69%

Absolute Meniscal Extrusion After Lateral Meniscal Allograft Transplantation Does Not Progress During Long-term Follow-up: Average of 10.3 Years’ Follow-up Longitudinal Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Long-term outcomes after lateral meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) are not completely understood. Purpose/Hypothesis: We investigated changes in meniscal extrusion in the coronal and sagittal planes using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after lateral MAT through long-term follow-up. We hypothesized that meniscal extrusion would progress during follow-up. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Patients subjected to lateral MAT were followed up by MRI evaluation in both planes at 1, 4 to 6, and >8 years after MAT. Meniscal extrusion and entire meniscal widths in the coronal plane and anterior (ACMD) and posterior (PCMD) cartilage meniscal distances in the sagittal plane were measured, and values were compared at each time point. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Lysholm score. Results: A total of 27 lateral MATs were included with a mean MRI follow-up period of 10.3 years (range, 8.1-15.3 years). The mean absolute meniscal extrusion (coronal plane) was not significantly different at each time point. However, the relative value differed (0.27 ± 0.04 at 1 year; 0.33 ± 0.06 at >8 years after MAT) owing to entire meniscal width reduction. There was no difference in the mean absolute value of the ACMD in the sagittal plane. However, relative values differed (0.21 ± 0.01 at 1 year; 0.27 ± 0.06 at >8 years) owing to entire meniscal width reduction. Absolute and relative values of the PCMD remained unaffected at each time point. The Lysholm score increased after surgery but did not differ postoperatively. Conclusion: During the long-term follow-up of extrusion after lateral MAT using MRI, absolute extrusion remained unchanged across all planes. Relative extrusion in the coronal plane and of the ACMD in the sagittal plane significantly increased, with no differences in the PCMD on follow-up. Clinical outcomes after surgery improved compared with those before surgery and were maintained throughout the long-term follow-up period.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 69%

Absolute Meniscal Extrusion After Lateral Meniscal Allograft Transplantation Does Not Progress During Long-term Follow-up: Average of 10.3 Years’ Follow-up Longitudinal Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The role of the meniscus concerning knee kinematics becomes more relevant in the ACL-deficient knee. 10,11,29 Previous biomechanical studies have demonstrated that the medial meniscus is a secondary restraint to anterior-posterior displacement in the ACL-deficient knee. 11,30…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Analysis of anterior tibial subluxation to the femur at maximum extension in anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees

Nishida

Matsushita

Araki

et al. 2019

J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The factors affecting anterior tibial subluxation (ATS) have not yet been well examined. To assess the factors affecting ATS in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-deficient knees. Methods: One hundred twenty-four patients with unilateral ACL injuries were included. True lateral views of the ACL-deficient knee and contralateral normal knee were obtained during maximum extension using fluoroscopy under general anesthesia, and ATS was calculated as the side-toside difference in the tibial position relative to the femur. Patients were divided into four groups according to the time from injury to surgery. To identify the factors affecting ATS, the following possible factors were assessed: (1) the time from injury to surgery, (2) presence of a medial meniscal injury, and (3) posterior tibial slope angle. Results: There was a positive correlation between the ATS ratio and the time from injury to surgery (r ¼ 0.52). The ratio of the presence of a medial meniscus injury was significantly higher in patients who underwent anterior tibial subluxation reconstruction (ACL-R) more than 12 months after an injury than in other patients who underwent ACL-R within 12 months after an injury. The ATS ratio was significantly higher in patients with a medial meniscus injury than in those without a medial meniscus injury (5.6% vs. 4.1%). Conclusions: Our results suggested that ACL-R should be performed within 6 months after injury if surgeons prefer to avoid an increase in ATS in maximum knee extension and at the latest within 12 months to avoid medial meniscal injury at the time of ACL-R.

show abstract

“…Because the meniscus is considered to be an important secondary stabilizer in the knee, such pathology may play a role in the patient's postoperative stability [2,19,28,47]. The size and type of meniscal defect may have attributed to discrepancies in stability between knees as much as the ACL reconstruction drilling technique [7,14,17,48]. Another factor that may play a role in postoperative stability is graft tension [12,18].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Does Anteromedial Portal Drilling Improve Footprint Placement in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction?

Arno

Bell

Alaia

et al. 2016

Clinical Orthopaedics &Amp; Related Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Considerable debate remains over which anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction technique can best restore knee stability. Traditionally, femoral tunnel drilling has been done through a previously drilled tibial tunnel; however, potential nonanatomic tunnel placement can produce a vertical graft, which although it would restore sagittal stability, it would not control rotational stability. To address this, some suggest that the femoral tunnel be created independently of the tibial tunnel through the use of an anteromedial (AM) portal, but whether this results in a more anatomic footprint or in stability comparable to that of the intact contralateral knee still remains controversial. Questions/purposes (1) Does the AM technique achieve footprints closer to anatomic than the transtibial (TT) technique? (2) Does the AM technique result in stability equivalent to that of the intact contralateral knee? (3) Are there differences in patient-reported outcomes between the two techniques? Methods Twenty male patients who underwent a bonepatellar tendon-bone autograft were recruited for this study, 10 in the TT group and 10 in the AM group. Patients in each group were randomly selected from four surgeons at our institution with both groups demonstrating similar demographics. The type of procedure chosen for each patient was based on the preferred technique of the surgeon. Some surgeons exclusively used the TT technique, whereas other surgeons specifically used the AM technique. Surgeons had no input on which patients were chosen to participate in this study. Mean postoperative time was 13 ± 2.8 and 15 ± 3.2 months for the TT and AM groups, respectively. Patients were identified retrospectively as having either the TT or AM Technique from our institutional database. At followup, clinical outcome scores were gathered as well as the footprint placement and knee stability assessed. To assess the footprint placement and knee stability, three-dimensional surface models of the femur, tibia, and ACL were created from MRI scans. The femoral and tibial footprints of the ACL reconstruction as compared with the intact contralateral ACL were determined. In addition, the AP displacement and rotational displacement of the femur were determined. Lastly, as a secondary measurement of stability, KT-1000 measurements were obtained at the followup visit. An a priori sample size calculation indicated that with 2n = 20 patients, we could detect a difference of 1 mm with 80% power at p \ 0.05. A Welch two-sample t-test (p \ 0.05) was performed to determine differences in the footprint measurements, AP displacement, rotational displacement, and KT-1000 measurements between the TT and AM groups. We further used the confidence interval approach with 90% confidence intervals on the pairwise mean group differences using a Games-Howell post hoc test to assess equivalence between the TT and AM groups for the previously mentioned measures. Results The AM and TT techniques were the same in terms of footprint except in the distal...

show abstract

Biomechanical function of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus: a human cadaveric study

Cited by 31 publications

References 21 publications

Absolute Meniscal Extrusion After Lateral Meniscal Allograft Transplantation Does Not Progress During Long-term Follow-up: Average of 10.3 Years’ Follow-up Longitudinal Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study

Absolute Meniscal Extrusion After Lateral Meniscal Allograft Transplantation Does Not Progress During Long-term Follow-up: Average of 10.3 Years’ Follow-up Longitudinal Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study

Analysis of anterior tibial subluxation to the femur at maximum extension in anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees

Does Anteromedial Portal Drilling Improve Footprint Placement in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About