2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2012.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomechanical Evaluation of Effect of Coracoid Tunnel Placement on Load to Failure of Fixation During Repair of Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
57
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, adequate visualization of the entire base of the coracoid is essential. Accurate coracoid tunnel placement particularly in the center-center or medial-center position in the coracoid minimizes bony failure risk [28]. The combination of minimization of the tunnel diameter in the coracoid and appropriate visualization are therefore recommended to help prevent coracoid fracture or cutout in techniques using transcoracoid fixation.…”
Section: Coracoid Fracture After Acromioclavicular Repair or Reconstrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, adequate visualization of the entire base of the coracoid is essential. Accurate coracoid tunnel placement particularly in the center-center or medial-center position in the coracoid minimizes bony failure risk [28]. The combination of minimization of the tunnel diameter in the coracoid and appropriate visualization are therefore recommended to help prevent coracoid fracture or cutout in techniques using transcoracoid fixation.…”
Section: Coracoid Fracture After Acromioclavicular Repair or Reconstrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A correct placement of transclavicular-transcoracoidal tunnel may reduce the risk of repair failure and cortical breach, as emphasized in recent anatomic considerations of transclaviculartranscoracoid drilling for coracoclavicular ligament [10,17,19]. Our experiment sought to evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of fluoro-free navigated transclaviculartranscoracoidal tunnel placement in comparison to drill guide-based targeting as used in arthroscopically assisted procedures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Nevertheless, complications such as persisting instability, loss of reduction, coracoid fracture, slip of the coracoid button with subsequent recurrent vertical instability and wound infection were observed [6][7][8]. One area of particular concern involves reports of coracoid process fracture and repair failure [9,10]. Taking into account the coracoid and clavicular anatomical variations and the patient's individual soft tissue proportion around the shoulder one may agree that anatomical placement of the tunnels is not always feasible with a rigid drill guide.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We performed a cadaver study (unpublished data) prior to this study and found that the anatomical relationship of the clavicle and the coracoid process is too complex to be precisely addressed by only using a drill guide, which is a rigid tool and not sufficiently flexible to adjust for any variations in the CC anatomy. Ferreira et al 23) showed a higher peak load to failure with a center-center or medial-center coracoid tunnel orientation, which may have lessened the risk of coracoid fracture during drilling with a 6 mm cannulated drill bit. In another cadaver study, a 4.5 mm coracoid tunnel provided greater fixation strength than a 6 mm tunnel in CC ligament reconstruction, and the base of the coracoid was more forgiving than the distal coracoid regarding location.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%